unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: "Karl Fogel" <kfogel@red-bean.com>,
	"Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>,
	"Stefan Monnier" <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>,
	"Emacs Development" <Emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Recommend these .gitconfig settings for git integrity.
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:17:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2twlrfrwb.fsf@newartisans.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B06282.2050701@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:02:10 -0800")

>>>>> Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:

> Should we pay the checking overhead to catch these reliability and security
> problems? That's the question. Emacs developers who are using this setting
> report that the overhead is small enough as to not be a significant issue,
> which suggests that the extra checking is a good idea.

Even still, this is purely a Git matter, and not an Emacs matter. This choice
shouldn't be automatically made on user's machine, however beneficial. It's
been recommended now in git-workflow, but should not be applied automatically.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2



  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-31 20:22 Recommend these .gitconfig settings for git integrity Karl Fogel
2016-01-31 20:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-01-31 21:37   ` Karl Fogel
2016-01-31 21:48     ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-01 15:42       ` Karl Fogel
2016-02-01 16:01         ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-01 16:24           ` Stefan Monnier
2016-02-01 16:39             ` Karl Fogel
2016-02-01 19:12               ` Stefan Monnier
2016-02-01 19:56                 ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-01 20:28                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-01 21:40                     ` Stefan Monnier
2016-02-02  8:02                     ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-02  8:17                       ` John Wiegley [this message]
2016-02-02 12:58                       ` Stefan Monnier
2016-02-02 15:49                       ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-02 17:55                         ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-02 18:48                           ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-03  7:31                             ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-03 16:20                               ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-03 18:10                                 ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-03 20:50                                   ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-04  3:53                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2016-02-02 23:22                           ` Karl Fogel
2016-02-03  0:20                             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-02-03  2:16                             ` John Wiegley
2016-02-03  2:26                               ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-03  6:35                                 ` John Wiegley
2016-02-03 15:47                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-03 17:40                                   ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-03 17:52                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-03 18:04                                       ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-04  0:20                                         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-02-02 16:19                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-01 18:39             ` John Wiegley
2016-02-01 16:35           ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-01 16:51             ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-01 17:40               ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-01 20:34                 ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-01 18:09               ` Karl Fogel
2016-02-01 20:56                 ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-02-01 21:07                   ` Karl Fogel
2016-02-02 10:30                 ` Tom
2016-02-02 15:37                   ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-02 17:24                     ` Tom
2016-02-02 17:54                       ` Paul Eggert
2016-02-01 20:50             ` Karl Fogel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2twlrfrwb.fsf@newartisans.com \
    --to=jwiegley@gmail.com \
    --cc=Emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=johnw@gnu.org \
    --cc=kfogel@red-bean.com \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    --cc=ofv@wanadoo.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).