From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:46:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <4F428780.8070902@cs.ucla.edu> <4F4D507F.7030008@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332456835 31115 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2012 22:53:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, AJMR To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 22 23:53:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqtE-0004ts-7r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:53:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38506 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqtD-0005uH-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:53:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqt9-0005tM-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqmM-0007Fj-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:47780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAqmG-00079e-6D; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3VDNKS5D7hz4Kn91; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:46:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from linux.local (ppp-88-217-115-54.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.115.54]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3VDNKR36cYz4KK4H; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:46:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D4AE71E5309; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:46:36 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Kids, don't gross me off.. ``Adventures with MENTAL HYGIENE'' can be carried too FAR! In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:34:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149183 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: > You mean you can't negate a signed int ? Yes, it can overflow. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."