From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: glyphless Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83haxcsgyk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332703179 5672 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2012 19:19:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 25 21:19:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SBsyW-0005MT-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57024 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBsyW-0008B1-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBsyT-0008Aw-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBsyR-0004eA-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:47301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBsyO-0004dP-Qt; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:19:28 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3VG7Zs6709z4Kn8v; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-134-120.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.134.120]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3VG7Zr610pz4KK9G; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1927ACA2AA; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:19:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: .. he dominates the DECADENT SUBWAY SCENE. In-Reply-To: <83haxcsgyk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:55:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149215 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I though Andreas said that using 25 here, so that the entire member > fits in 32 bits, would be better (performance-wise, I presume)? I guess the difference, if any, will be lost in the noise (glyphless chars are rare anyway). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."