From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Please check if scratch/igc builds with native compilation Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 05:10:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r0du5rly.fsf@gmail.com> <87le425p8i.fsf@gmail.com> <87ed9u5lbi.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikz56j66.fsf@gmail.com> <87cypc7v8y.fsf@gmail.com> <878r007tpf.fsf@gmail.com> <87y18060y5.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0ds5qrp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Andrea Corallo , Emacs Devel , Eli Zaretskii To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 24 05:11:53 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sALLV-0007PR-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 05:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sALKZ-0008Bx-5h; Thu, 23 May 2024 23:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sALKW-0008B1-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2024 23:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sALKV-0004pN-2b; Thu, 23 May 2024 23:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5785161b98cso199216a12.1; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:10:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716520248; x=1717125048; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XBEIEqRZXo5hQRovg/q6B9EmQGESV2+vSpLdNpBnZRo=; b=jNqao7LYFlJb+xQDE5SNGVL8GCxPJiQEDAJdh2QubtCMQAckETbsYBcouSMNMgh/MZ WCN7O6d0VUyxELrGeoNuyilwO+3QpNEEAXlhNnkQ0RGElt4RcEt4qonI4hIAPrh2FYI+ RtEvi7bW6rZZTkXbxcnM/MiyK9e3RzNTLkdd/59IzZ2pX9r/fB4a1fMZIrQMjmcmkWL5 5WLP2PwWpVObB/eWDCDS3wBmfy/6q0gKgsKHCE4bwwfiQVFs6WqTCW8Fok0chdDoiD7a bt2WyBSbXZ3QFL8Ep++XtTSIM9/eCNQUihmfz+v0+G6Q8k0wuJyxpgt8RnWEe/13B80O q+yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716520248; x=1717125048; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XBEIEqRZXo5hQRovg/q6B9EmQGESV2+vSpLdNpBnZRo=; b=OR8RAX0JL55FrCjRpzAOgWBEuUbb7NK8TRfGfKdlLBZdlK9q/vMPLtcjISx3lqiDmd OYiq7hAGHwfjrOu9RLMg+thGCuiFWEeX3MTDcKZEAS5UMWMb4hLG0o2rZJH+jVm8EaNV XywQ3MB5WxvXG3zow9Tx/N8wW1/6JHds4TgstYghzxGOWW5pASzUxb2j18Nw5iBtzgDf FpnjuiLLI5t6XdDwUMiDXyXoiyVfnajRt7C0cp+abxQM+1YO7MWNy2kF4FA5Y7W0sV1z sc9LMf5HCyevOAmzV0NgP3Yl5XJBjMtxpiQHEjEYmU7cwCYdT2bpQCSSOxRa9I2/VQyS 8/Ag== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXY/ofiTXxqnzXByF6ae2mwBOdXkCr85QKTNnRPO5dG54CLPBBI/DNACw/NkOH68Y3FrIurkV2xmRfh8KBP3hGaloXf+u8n5qPABzNblBncejg= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznWSgxoXrezEDuH+kk4W4tKIQw02mDbUho5V2dvcuLySrAUtJF fmtuuU2KMxtA+XMm+TyiOk+7vPOT0StR255R3uwuclG1jxHII+OrqDi9IA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGKERSGgM/WEMckyb20/RSrwZvGuZBnHu/yFSa838H4rL/KGGrc++OElTfFLqPG/8IK0dXBLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:c946:0:b0:56e:10d3:85e3 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5785194fa92mr698360a12.13.1716520248292; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a529.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.165.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57852495debsm707665a12.69.2024.05.23.20.10.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 May 2024 20:10:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r0ds5qrp.fsf@gmail.com> (Helmut Eller's message of "Thu, 23 May 2024 20:26:02 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::535; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x535.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319531 Archived-At: Helmut Eller writes: > On Thu, May 23 2024, Gerd M=C3=B6llmann wrote: > >> Thanks, but it didn't help, I'm afraid. > > There's some checking code in comp.c. Maybe you could add this > > void > check_all_comp_units (void) > { > igc_collect (); > struct Lisp_Hash_Table *h =3D XHASH_TABLE (Vcomp_loaded_comp_units_h); > DOHASH (h, k, cu) > { > eassert (NATIVE_COMP_UNITP (cu)); > fprintf (stderr, "key: %s\n", SSDATA (k)); > check_comp_unit_relocs (XNATIVE_COMP_UNIT (cu)); > } > } >=20=20=20 > and call it from the debugger. If this check passes then I think the > relocs are in pretty good shape. Thanks for helping me! Since I'm not sure if relocs are the culprit this time around, I'll also add the roots for a dylib very early, so that there is no "reasonable" doubt they exist. I'll use this fact: .../igc/native-lisp/30_0_50-5cce80dd % nm -g -s __DATA __common radix-tre= e-669a468d-316fbcdc.eln=20=20=20 00000000000050e0 S _comp_unit 00000000000050e8 S _current_thread_reloc 00000000000050f0 S _d_reloc 0000000000005220 S _d_reloc_eph 00000000000053d8 S _d_reloc_imp 0000000000005438 S _f_symbols_with_pos_enabled_reloc 0000000000005440 S _freloc_link_table 0000000000005448 S _pure_reloc IOW, I can compute the sizes of the reloc arrays from symbol addresses. (On macOS, the format is Mach-O, the segment/section names are probably different in ELF). Let's see. But I need to collect enough energy for doing this first ;-).