From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gpg-agent support removed?! Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0510031250u66ea1349yb437d539ce4027ef@mail.gmail.com> <87pskfq361.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <877j6mg2af.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <87zmixfur1.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144414895 12639 80.91.229.2 (7 Apr 2006 13:01:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 13:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daiki Ueno , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Reiner Steib , ding@gnus.org, Simon Josefsson Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 15:01:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRqaP-0002zC-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:01:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRqaP-0001TT-10 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRqZs-0001T3-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:00:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRqZo-0001SL-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRqZo-0001SD-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.141.58.119] (helo=km1136.keymachine.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FRqdm-0001dz-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 09:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.de (xdsli174.osnanet.de [212.95.109.174]) (authenticated bits=0) by km1136.keymachine.de (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k37D0Tan028456; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:00:29 +0200 Original-Received: from wilde by kenny.sha-bang.de with local (Kenny MUA v.0409034.42) ID 1FRqZj-0002X0-LZ; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:00:31 +0200 Original-To: Romain Francoise In-Reply-To: <87zmixfur1.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> (Romain Francoise's message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:14:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52495 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62579 Archived-At: Romain Francoise wrote: > Sascha Wilde writes: > >> And why was it done without any discussion or even informing the >> people involved?!? > > Since PGG is historically a Gnus package, it was discussed on the ding > mailing-list, which you obviously don't read... :-) That's true, so please CC me at any response. (at least if it doesn't go too emacs-devel, too). Thanks to everybody for summarizing the discussion. May I suggest to revert the code to version 1.8 from GNU Emacs CVS instead? This version includes my original agent support code and Reiners small compatibility fix. I would prefer this version because it: - allow using the agent - but only if enabled explicitly by the user, so the default behavior is completely unchanged compared to the old code - introduces only very few code changes, with no known bugs - has none of the problems of Daikis code regarding robustness or api changes IIRC this version was already discussed and accepted for 5.10. cheers sascha -- Sascha Wilde Well, *my* brain likes to think it's vastly more powerful than any finite Turing machine but it hasn't proven that to me... -- Christopher Koppler in comp.lang.lisp