From: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: when emacs 22.1 release will ready?
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:37:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2r6q29mh8.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4635C39F.9050502@gmail.com
----- Lennart Borgman (gmail) (2007-04-30) wrote:-----
> Leo wrote:
>
>> Long term release hurts every project. The huge success of the kernel
>> again shows the only thing to make RMS change is to do something
>> better than him like what XEmacs did in the past and what Ubuntu did
>> to Debian.
>
>
> Is not one of the things behind the Ubuntu success that it is
> financially backed up by someone with both resources and a kind
> interest in the project?
That's maybe one reason but there are tons of other ditros backed by
companies.
> I do not know very much about Xemacs, but since I think that lack of
> resources is crucial here I think that things would have been much
> better without that split.
NO. The lack of resources is a cause of long release cycle. I feel it is
unfair the developers valid point of view is deliberately ignored by
rms.
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-30 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-29 20:37 when emacs 22.1 release will ready? Alex Ott
2007-04-30 9:21 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-04-30 9:33 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 9:38 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-30 9:53 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-30 21:30 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 23:29 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-04-30 9:56 ` Thomas Hühn
2007-04-30 10:18 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 10:15 ` joakim
2007-04-30 10:25 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 22:10 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-30 15:18 ` unit testing [was Re: when emacs 22.1 release will ready?] Stephen J. Turnbull
2007-04-30 10:09 ` when emacs 22.1 release will ready? Leo
2007-04-30 10:23 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-04-30 10:37 ` Leo [this message]
2007-04-30 11:29 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-04-30 15:20 ` Chong Yidong
2007-04-30 23:26 ` Leo
2007-04-30 22:09 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2r6q29mh8.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk \
--to=sdl.web@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).