From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: burden of maintainance Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:56:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <560CEA6A.9000907@online.de> <834miaa847.fsf@gnu.org> <83eghd7j3j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443779021 22173 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 09:43:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 11:43:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhwsJ-0002XU-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:43:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhwsI-0002Rr-KX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhw8t-0006av-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhw8t-00054Q-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:38178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhw8p-00053t-8n; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so21976317wic.1; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 01:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=pLKeR0u9GkS3MgHhKNDx56d72JaWft1r3j4LX9IgPGI=; b=zQkqeKphL+VQIRurzpLZ/tUSOrgjA367hzJgAPl6wJ5h4OKT+3Aja/iSjep9L5f5X6 vBXNh2ZHx1ODR06xvphFsL6BRhVTooikcZ9VLoezdS/xLm11RfhmAQeXndSuRv7wwv9o bYs2oOljmh2mrk4YOtfrTzQoVtRbpT3W4WU1mAdDRIexBKF+L4jal/YSzTeIKqP4+NOQ Pf//97yU3aiTQQRoGM7EeaJsyReNOHMJVsXTKrXMXDxFoi0gqjz6458De2710SMPbHx7 3h5TCXm2Z3j8W50HN9MscFQHB/EKyOq3SX/RAT0sGFE2o1xkcx+A4FtRhuDwCiwpSGBy qs/Q== X-Received: by 10.194.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr15170788wjc.21.1443776194332; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 01:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ix (dial-180234.pool.broadband44.net. [212.46.180.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fs9sm7279475wic.24.2015.10.02.01.56.33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2015 01:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhw8n-0000ZN-0T; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:56:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83eghd7j3j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:47:12 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190665 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 02 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Helmut Eller >> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:51:43 +0200 >> >> On Thu, Oct 01 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > Suggestions for how to improve our test suite without alienating >> > potential contributors are welcome. >> >> For a start, fix bug#16853. > > Why that particular bug? We have lots of open bugs; what's special > about that one. I thought you were interested in suggestion to improve something but as usual you aren't. My mistake; should know that my now. >> Second, make it easy to run the test suite in non-batch mode > > It's already possible, I do that quite a lot. What doesn't work for > you? bug#16853. Helmut