From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 37940b3: min and max now return one of their arguments Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:04:12 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20170307012700.3354.30219@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170307012701.1C05D23F1F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488942305 20429 195.159.176.226 (8 Mar 2017 03:05:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 03:05:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 08 04:04:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clRuK-0004Qc-Ow for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 04:04:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53715 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clRuQ-0003qu-Q3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clRuK-0003qo-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:04:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clRuH-0000Wr-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:04:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]:35190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clRuH-0000WW-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:04:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 67so2091439pfg.2 for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:04:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=uMygQimfC0VyFfj+jIKllRm1HH/RVA7SUUS0Xu+2IKo=; b=k1eUl1oSloJ15xKacRRj35A3s2r9CZTPWd3/N7JeR22mpOfccCzFdG8n22PxxjkoBz Bvt215e1f9yq/w0MpsY7Nh6P6/6vocM2NlC5x6mp52tIYwo0IOC0JLXEEzBdbIcTB6Nx LIVUh2rAHqNHXTDbWueybEmLXGKYjSZIxnCM96kru9X5mn/Ga8Plbr5mzpdu6HOMp8b/ HlWFAb/VWRQm4LLqplZyTeUlFvjNlggyMVzq7I6Ojk0HZ9q8z1zMy+0xRBZLMiLHlrWD 5hZmJQgzZbFrvkCfDSFivrLnd5dV+uw8swwKQ5Ji+NRBphgmg/PUtf6LtSa5dJVf/M5i 7Ksw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=uMygQimfC0VyFfj+jIKllRm1HH/RVA7SUUS0Xu+2IKo=; b=r43zOrC+hKhI9pPyMucN5E8V8wuUJWUYXZtXEVAZQIQcbnH4Z++sUjwQAMcm/1LK+x wsVrP1m+cyuiRp7QBP8Xn/ZqpwfEd98N4hRb6t9pZcg06Q2jSBMrkXfeJpOce+2OG5lb EFLhWHQZ3lUoIynFyipUKHMWjrHviRyyp15PDsR+AWszXMchRLRJLx/9M+6F93YxNXZg WwRzS56L/h5cu0bLOyxrc3DlIHpwRD/SU4d9lPWDHw4xyeWP+Yjt/5MwFywNH5MpdE0I 9itbqrbs/Rgj42MyWpanY9j5Il0aFlE8pBtM9aknVDxlQ3sKw+l6h9fZN7aZ1avcq1yc Fi9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nQxVLomPKPwvauXm8qWtD9vktmqKp+ZkItXBU3Y5MM98kal9qwLOhZhRrBtel97w== X-Received: by 10.84.215.215 with SMTP id g23mr5186172plj.159.1488942291151; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:04:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s65sm2234851pgb.64.2017.03.07.19.04.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:04:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 919F22649BFF; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:05:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:04:57 -0500") Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Paul Eggert X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212824 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "SM" =3D=3D Stefan Monnier writes: >> min and max now return one of their arguments SM> Since this is an incompatible change, I'm wondering what is the motivat= ion SM> for this change. I can see advantages to both behaviors, but I don't see SM> an overriding advantage that would justify getting over the inertia and SM> breaking backward compatibility. Yes, same here, I would like to know this as well. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEE3lW3afxXihSlvlQwwUTY9PGf5jAFAli/dK0ACgkQwUTY9PGf 5jAgQQv9G3MYEjaptj0pJPYakKn6nYijVChO8EE5rhpxZpauTrp8zX9nThrLgvgi TSx1mVLe8AA8LvrBcI+6/aablEeXvbbWf7ndX+HRj2e48d8mVXySOKXaMaemae10 /9WP+4dyinH+opBiHlSO3J+lJ9nX26Jrg/bplyLpYcrxN4a/eRrLoNSO4WNxeXu2 xjhXlmKsfhZvfcqzwGKEiOfgdCA32uiwGqvgHt+X7B9lvJjiSPqLgRm+H8UROfod LqchHMfEhFkrH1s3DyF2oBsl0cUW+LYpJNGsg/EaNHsSS2IPir4ctlC16rulpzww yc9g21qwp0aTnvCH/PeFNxCRy5tQAXQaJ/xwjh9CKi0ISDLD9yaAfcx6w59iQchU E3cm5PAYTNvRArJcavj12ou5E8I6VM/DNfPXcRP2cEUn8fA3z+f4VQ0lBO8yNvxP Wy9BeTiRna82atb16nyZYyLIQoLFV0JpR5F9Gy7uT97+GrNjNAyBYN30kU0QDFpE SY1DANG1 =QRDo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--