From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defcustom and the stars. Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bql94aru.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168316122 5040 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 04:15:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 05:15:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H48ON-0000WY-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:15:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H48OM-0008PI-Tv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H41SG-0006Ug-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H41SD-0006Rv-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H41SC-0006Rp-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.168] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H41SC-0002ta-6U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so7088355ugf for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:50:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:cc:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-sa-exim-connect-ip:x-sa-exim-mail-from:x-spam-checker-version:x-spam-level:x-spam-status:subject:x-sa-exim-version:x-sa-exim-scanned; b=HD+e7scomcNrBSoGeJdUgGOP8RkHHqWCi/RncAEWcWrojqQ0V+2mY0zaHTaIpL2m072vo50PpYD1fR1v8qv4CPAKBkS+5PGG27ZGGV6ZHmeX1LXTbWM4JH5mYMFi/i69eioAQu6ar/FJ+5TqSllEq7a/gyv2Ejj9jDu2FPMRz34= Original-Received: by 10.67.119.9 with SMTP id w9mr22201132ugm.1168289446719; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:50:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from chrislap.local ( [89.176.28.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5sm33496125ugc.2007.01.08.12.50.45; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:50:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chrislap.local) by chrislap.local with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H41S7-0002By-0k; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:50:44 +0100 Original-To: michael@cadilhac.name (=?windows-1250?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) In-Reply-To: <87bql94aru.fsf@lrde.org> (=?windows-1250?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac's message of "Mon\, 08 Jan 2007 19\:46\:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dooglus@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:39:09 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on chrislap.local) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:15:06 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65040 Archived-At: michael@cadilhac.name (Micha=EBl Cadilhac) writes: > I think the bug is in Stuart's side :-) You get two copies because: > - One is sent directly to you, > - One is sent to the ML which has the task to send you a copy. I only get one copy of each mail, too. If I am addressed personally, I don't get a copy from the list. Could it be that the list doesn't forward mail to you if it can see that you're already getting a copy directly? And could it also be that when people were mailing you directly, they were using a different address than the mailing list had for you?