From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native image rotation Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:11:36 +1100 Message-ID: References: <20190224113050.GA67303@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83tvgtnoyh.fsf@gnu.org> <20190224232228.GA67813@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83y364mtde.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="147300"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (darwin) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 06:12:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8Yn-000cEo-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 06:12:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8Ym-0001Mc-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57757) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8Yg-0001MV-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8Yf-0005RJ-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39284 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8Ye-0004z8-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gy8YJ-000bmG-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 06:11:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:T6fmWO8DdB/nfpuc9F7QCIkUMQk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233591 Archived-At: > the increase in the screen estate taken > by a rotated image. I'm asking whether > it's worth it. A use case is to compensate for an image taken at, say, a 30-degree tilt, which was done to lengthen the horizontal distance captured corner to corner.