From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: William Rankin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Appropriate way for package to require seq for Emacs 24.5? Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 02:55:21 +1000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="54665"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 27.0.90 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 18:57:06 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHAH1-000E50-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:57:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHAH0-00014h-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jH9JU-0001QK-SS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jH9JT-0002v6-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:35775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jH9JT-0002uH-Gx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95AD5C023D; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bydasein.com; h= references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=i3tKO2auLvk+2Vf8+Vorcgy1CH cubfnW/BWd2efc9pw=; b=Ji7AKyDUSyPuABJxoOqoIdqi8hdp7VD+vSRm93Q2WU xohsjDJwlcgZP2h2Z9QWf/ZqJa+H/A3gcSnU2HoqBbR8+1B4lEgOgwP08OhdNK/G Z/zqpRxzTLk8m32o59YI+ItUyHs57KDJV9u/kK9dljZPLoeSNp4syMkjUdHqS8VU cUKoEC8MuCl9gy9pIYJmuccdWwI8jgnw82F9EbIOHaQyPL8sU4l1q/d/Ss28occy ZYl+Wt6pg7R+VXl5oxX/tvUrtEQ00Bgblle4tehrIfpAWnYd9B/X47/4P7rCpO8t rYUn65FMemZZ2Z+Ncu+hMWbc6jPLFq5DZqJ06M5eyx7A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=i3tKO2 auLvk+2Vf8+Vorcgy1CHcubfnW/BWd2efc9pw=; b=bT57rHEZJu3yhG9sd7KJtB QaZ6Dn1+IhQrfMpPIu0my3ReP+HMtkL2hVMQH4tnC6haH2Cjj8tKyfzkVwpBVyjU jaXi2MZGavZ2TgZdTCAVWwcT97l+5b48nJWcSrLpaiOc/MioY2R9gNNcN7ygGKMv mN8BD885zniGOGM48utdqSpV4bGIneSqkxNHw5RhU0PyEB1eAPDGDld0dXzrSJX9 zwh9iJBW6J6YwmzO1nrpEBbHjB9uEQSwRYGr4z5JJL2+WD6+nHP4Xs648eIyJeZv Z5SBc6zB5bNbmREZsl4dCMxL45woC3OiJ68WD0DqlItdfea0GtCNk/QVBapERAaQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehgedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufgjfffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeghihhllhhi rghmucftrghnkhhinhcuoeifihhllhhirghmsegshigurghsvghinhdrtghomheqnecukf hppeduvddtrddvvddrvdefuddrvdefieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeifihhllhhirghmsegshigurghsvghinhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [120.22.231.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C72CD30661B2; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:55:28 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:55:48 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245790 Archived-At: I apologise for the previous garbled message. May I ask the appropriate way for a package to require seq for Emacs 24.5? Currently I have: > Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.5") (seq "2.20")) However, I see in the seq commentary: > While seq.el version 1.8 is in GNU ELPA for convenience, seq.el > version 2.0 requires Emacs>=25.1. Am I correct in interpreting that the above package header would not work with 24.5? If so, would this work? > Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.5") (seq "1.11")) Thank you, and again, sorry for the previous MIME noise.