From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Filipp Gunbin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#48548: 28.0.50; Some process attributes on macOS are missing Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:30:38 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83bl94oco2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnrsmlej.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33878"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 14:33:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4LX-0008YJ-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:33:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4LW-0004tq-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4Ih-00024R-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:47 -0400 Original-Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:57739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lk4Ie-0004c5-3d; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225A615CE; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=GRxiusLTb4Zi0ul9y92k2xzDLQ O9lnNYpWEvLRczAWo=; b=vvg65kylSPg+nj6m/5Ad6ZO8SO01Y+5Uf3xz9ugInS 53Jqxx7kwZ5AA/N4MrI3bD1Liwvm8Z3ER79V4XOLF3krGttkq+jRLJWRbeKAKy6C pVtgjJ9sNTnrGROM04fnNmnvXl6Amb1i6PtLielxQ0odom6VteoV/lmGilBMGnI1 THMT+BgyGlr7F+uwZAZ4ruQGiacmLxtnlkEURnUkNwOr+oifIf00o3Pe086n3Kp4 mmtfJdd/SiVZ784k88kIpm8zqO/bsET5wtmECvxm5jvWoDUq2EsnIfjxm3q2yGaG QtAfPu2hGBMMY/bpm7TXA0gdPl4KENtn0QjpwEnkeFrQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=GRxius LTb4Zi0ul9y92k2xzDLQO9lnNYpWEvLRczAWo=; b=jJD+8mokmA3+jvkHSqHLRm 6/J40WtA27XBI6ClioWbYSUNhcLHqe/ST+USBxNv94XfLwf1BKoQ+nTuCU4laAL9 kMY6UdNL6IElw2KdWngMqeCqaTU8bm+5NqlrKH3gcA7bfLwhetneUZVA00Sqj0h+ XG34ilDB3FK8bPb3fw1dD41tgn4iLtS+miM8EcZ6WgCyp/Vl5nJK4SeY608ENDKE RxGG2iAJQHGMsU+n2sjIn3B42iMCBwwoKURZaM2yGMAIPlaWoRMZ8ewGY45hXQoe Dja4vgsdHeGkIsBXFJWKQ3aiDgdbvvL0/Am6L1cr2J29f4Mp38IxRNGQlWFo8G3w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdejfedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhlihhp phcuifhunhgsihhnuceofhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepvdevkeffvdeuvefhuddtjeehkedvueefveettddtveduudfgieffieev ieevhfdtnecukfhppeekgedrvddtgedrudelfedruddtieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehfghhunhgsihhnsehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from fgunbin.local (unknown [84.204.193.106]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83wnrsmlej.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 May 2021 13:27:48 +0300") Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=fgunbin@fastmail.fm; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269550 Archived-At: On 21/05/2021 13:27 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Filipp Gunbin >> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:50:50 +0300 >> Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Pinging wasn't my intent, I just wanted to ask for review on >> emacs-devel.. > > Cross-posting on both bug-gnu-emacs and emacs-devel is generally not a > good idea, so please try not to do that in the future. The people who > are likely to review your patch are reading the bug list anyway. Yes, I know that crossposting is not generally appreciated, but in this case it's a bit different: I'm not posting the same message, rather I'm creating a bug as a container for patch (I wanted to try debbugs package, although I failed to do it properly, and the tagging message went without patch - now I see where I was wrong, I didn't select the commit _range_ with debbugs-gnu-pick-commits, but rather just a commit), and the review request as an actual message. What is best to do such things in the future? Just post a bug with tag "patch", or just directly post patch to emacs-devel? I don't want to cause inconvenience, sorry for this time. Filipp