From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Documenting gpg-agent Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0042782071==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166381831 14816 80.91.229.10 (17 Dec 2006 18:57:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 17 19:57:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gw1C6-0007Pk-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:57:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gw1C5-00060X-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gw1Bg-0005mA-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gw1Be-0005jc-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:56:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gw1Bd-0005iW-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:56:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.141.58.119] (helo=km1136.keymachine.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gw1Bc-0003wY-NK; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:56:37 -0500 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.de (xdslca211.osnanet.de [89.166.128.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by km1136.keymachine.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kBHIuTEp008872; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:29 +0100 Original-Received: from wilde by kenny.sha-bang.de with local (Kenny MUA v.0409034.42) ID 1Gw1BV-0002Yg-TO; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:29 +0100 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Sascha Wilde's message of "Sun\, 17 Dec 2006 19\:44\:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63897 Archived-At: --===============0042782071== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sascha Wilde wrote: > I have added a short paragraph (see attached patch) to point out, that > the use of gpg-agent is recommended and where to get further information. Since GnuPG2 and therefor gpg-agent is released, and we are recommending its use: should we change the default value of pgg-gpg-use-agent to t? When no agent is available the old passphrase input/caching will still be used as a fallback so changing the default should not do much harm. cheers sascha =2D-=20 Sascha Wilde : "Lies, was ich meine, nicht, was ich schreibe." : (Urs Traenkner in de.alt.admin) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhZLcchutvmkRUCQRAtGOAJ928TbDAQiTCtQ+43yV3Up/8xWPsQCfWIBD NyXPfeQoOuqM6yt9M+EBNzs= =1kkr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============0042782071== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --===============0042782071==--