From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:44 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pozgjnry.fsf@gnu.org> <83lha4jly2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447275693 16267 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:01:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:01:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcWE-00025D-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:01:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcWE-0000h2-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcVo-0000cn-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcVn-0000qM-8W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]:34369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcVg-0000oa-7h; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:00:52 -0500 Original-Received: by padhx2 with SMTP id hx2so41262123pad.1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=wp9Tknwse3vXWxG1u4FbAfBJcWiaWikU4ip570d6xNc=; b=MDSVNADQti3Sp3HcWdXG2lhndLYm6PZfg9bfq0IiVLsPT/aXdej9zeV8ASLqb87qNK 4TISzQPkjx5rsMKSOkk5yp7FPJFtC+nV5xohcs5aUNXZO2/zAGZ6hehWv7asJbB+0yWc Wwt+mK0tSDOCznQNSXypsdCZtDMgh9lceP5wyRVh6WNp2BtoCQUWXbOVRb2vgnu/RYNN uanz8saXN7wfrNxfbKjVL8ZdosH2U2ZDXc3o4HNqJ6ck6ujCrZXJuZkpvthdvbDI8ckx oUc6YyFdK9AOsrbIaqd2pCZ41XFuyUcoih/3FwlYfLCnV3vXyKj0Oa9YcnenpluVYcOu muXQ== X-Received: by 10.66.246.225 with SMTP id xz1mr17345561pac.27.1447275650860; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ia3sm10978247pbb.5.2015.11.11.13.00.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8560710560498; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83lha4jly2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:55:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , kfogel@red-bean.com, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194142 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > To me, nothing about electric-indent-mode is reasonable. I don't mind > swapping C-m and C-j, if that's what will keep me sane. If > electric-indent-mode did just that, perhaps I'd be fine with it. Out of interest, who has a passionate feeling that it should be the default? If very few think so, perhaps we can disable it and revisit that decision after 25.1 is out. I don't want to wade through past history unless it is really important to several people that it be in the next release. John