From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: weak hash tables Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 13:19:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878qyeffjh.fsf@localhost> <8734olzlws.fsf@gmail.com> <867cdx32e3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14621"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, yantar92@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 07 13:20:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sQPw6-0003Z9-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 13:20:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQPvM-0001DL-VI; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 07:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQPvK-0001Cu-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 07:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sQPvH-0001kw-K4; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 07:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58b447c519eso3591848a12.3; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720351152; x=1720955952; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G3v2stkb+z8A/iWacwzoK5Dnb9tpmTQHySpVH/i0aJc=; b=FB2adkk0IprLrNjdgPAUnz/gl38CW4Sp0e9RhRRhDKHCzVKgDCyoWJSFeRskh4znET HIGWAj0YasGFTn0rqYEohFuTSR/TtN6GrhbUcPsjyZuGCccQSvkkWEdWwgUxquEJOw62 UZMbiCB6NO9cW8KtQSLLH9eZQ/diZ6vFRsfOiyodVORj9IhlIyYq9UL9QvEThl00T7QX jid0+WsT4x+rw0gWNDy71oDmT1xH/MHGTpQD6n7SknlE1C/jxzvSNemCLnrG4zrlATa4 fdOgTNjcSxLCVmig2+AZJGwBjv9SJtgOKtCNm6l8BfpIwRhN1eE+gUYeYMdLDa0xTfcG qiAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720351152; x=1720955952; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G3v2stkb+z8A/iWacwzoK5Dnb9tpmTQHySpVH/i0aJc=; b=G4YgjU2EnLYGpeGlSr4gu370Z7wcD+2skzP1m7afbN+WcanqSq3xnh+NQE/uQxaODi F9Uci679L6X6jj9ocaJWCIm/DGEJmaJxasITSsPo0N9hMmKbe9pSxomTqUkiytUNPzNz WxOVcNZrzkIwrqO/ehYI07DDrBNiLApef8pMYuRFgt7lwb1ydOeanDc2ci+/0UZ297ny YHlmw4K978dsGYNz0amVE5tifbho+BIwUanC4Hwg5pKd508Gkq1cUQBzdeSWwPAjRGwF p3uYCy5xMV41PMquKIydll5kmVjQQdtanlpaL4WEv1N1m7tYhgFC7vUkmB7NVEh0VfE0 FqNg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjBYlKqnjlfdc4/bCwBamDuhoa/FrUAdKSzjREaA6jaAGVngOc6blcadh6smTAlEcLqg5//dPWOXrp6wuGGMyLJtHy X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSWyFvzgiUUm5wAsZNtrMo8jFETtrTPgPTLknS0ohiw+yvKFsz yup8WyBpYgtkynCk4N3Qc8v9gWaWAbM/LwDlcBt1Xiyz863TrJDeNmCeOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFsSEnjF1NpmPXKV6ZLpDdVqRf8m+aGr+NNqmOhrnTpWig1sT3mhBmUfuXPD8G4FxZgoHmu2g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b809:b0:a77:dd1c:626e with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a77dd1c6437mr319430566b.60.1720351151586; Sun, 07 Jul 2024 04:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a778.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.167.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a77cf0b9181sm202275166b.99.2024.07.07.04.19.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 04:19:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <867cdx32e3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 07 Jul 2024 13:47:00 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::532; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321480 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Balancing only changes the tree structure, without freeing nodes, AFAIR. >> But that could be wrong. It's been a long time since I looked closer at >> that tree. > > We free nodes in sweep_intervals. I think that is handled in igc.c by intervals becoming unreachable.