From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generalizing find-definition Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20141102151524.0d9c665c@forcix> <85egsem1u2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <867fy0or7p.fsf@yandex.ru> <86ppbqn841.fsf@yandex.ru> <8761diro00.fsf@engster.org> <871to5svj2.fsf@engster.org> <87wq5xrggq.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418369250 28689 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2014 07:27:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Engster Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 08:27:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKdD-0000GC-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:27:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKdD-0007Ga-4Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:27:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKd1-0007Fe-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:27:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKcs-0001Xx-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:57462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKcs-0001Xt-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l15so1632380wiw.4 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=4fTlaOwCGvs54/8Mll/KJyvRNjVhgH47dRPCxC1j3A8=; b=AH5idvhQESE7yWMmnEiY2MRNb8/J0DeDnIOcXaRicNKjPTN4Nhql6ZxOBAhZDgwiCY Qsx/s0RtuWfowDWT43UQxH8AhPRPSQgzsPnlpKACmh7QRdybW4uKPd0rTb7Nw6hdW93g YQ82DTwjeTJoeEtyByNF1Z/HMZcAJOUAgMl+zCNz29jKuEmQIxiiOsWEUq6r2kDdnvOm wQnvC3Ecypbhmqe4mcDfLClUapdwCZmOUYOqoUaD5h0bFzjV0Wxv3Qnxqh3a83BmgKyz pAM7sgksMpZe/uB37KfnrLdlqqhWLQDwOhzERSyP1jrqqmjTHGuDihsNpZiGS4hfb3+T FJ2A== X-Received: by 10.194.178.231 with SMTP id db7mr23810975wjc.112.1418369217547; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:26:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ix ([212.46.172.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm711653wjx.0.2014.12.11.23.26.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:26:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from helmut by ix with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzKcp-0000uF-0p; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wq5xrggq.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:04:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179864 Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 11 2014, David Engster wrote: > David Engster writes: >> The only way is to separate everything that needs EIEIO into a separate >> file with its own autoloads. > > I just took a quick look at xref and understand a bit better what you're > trying to do. It's not about loading xref but the backends. > > Your hack should work for your special case. If you look into what > eieio-defclass-autoload does, you'll see that the general case is more > complicated, because you might need to set up superclasses as well. > > If your hack is acceptable is up to Stefan, of course... Thanks for the answers. Helmut