From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #29083: Is it OK to add a new function to the emacs-26 branch? Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:05:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20171101112144.GB5276@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509555988 10619 195.159.176.226 (1 Nov 2017 17:06:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/26.0 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 18:06:20 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSs-0000uT-AI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 18:06:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSz-0006oH-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSo-0006kj-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSi-0004O0-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSi-0004Nu-A0; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:34171) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e9wSi-0004kC-38; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CA520C9D; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:05:52 -0400 X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [76.234.69.149]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 870697FAC4; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 188C1A6178AF; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171101112144.GB5276@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:21:44 +0000") Mail-Followup-To: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219848 Archived-At: >>>>> "AM" == Alan Mackenzie writes: AM> However, the OP has requested that a function which actually displays this AM> name be put into CC Mode. Would it still be OK to do this on the emacs-26 AM> branch, or is this branch now closed for such things? I think that since we're now prepping for release with pretests out there, it's become too late. Nothing stops us from getting a 26.2 out the door soon after, though. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2