From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <4F428780.8070902@cs.ucla.edu> <4F4D507F.7030008@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332459499 17588 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2012 23:38:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, AJMR To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 00:38:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAraD-00060W-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAraD-0001tp-7e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:38:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAraA-0001tO-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAra9-00027d-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:43228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAra6-00026o-IL; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3VDPSv0b1Lz3hhYL; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from linux.local (ppp-88-217-115-54.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.115.54]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3VDPSt1hmTz4KK4C; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 961091E5309; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:05 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I'm CONTROLLED by the CIA!! EVERYONE is controlled by the CIA!! In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:06:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149186 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: > Well ... the range is not wider with an unsigned int. Unsigned arithmetics can never overflow. > Maybe I'm too naive but if x is unsigned, I don't expect to > see -x . The implicit semantics for unsigned is x >= 0. -x is well defined for any value of unsigned integer type. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."