From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 11:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83tw5pg1q3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zifhulc2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h91og80k.fsf@gnu.org> <87pogbuhoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <834lxndmd9.fsf@gnu.org> <87efwrug6z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r30qu5av.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874lxmtxyy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r30prvwt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8337d4csez.fsf@gnu.org> <87r30nq9el.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83inlyc1k2.fsf@gnu.org> <87inlyrfni.fsf@lifelogs.com> <837f2eb845.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziedpyy1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d1b75u8a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2znntaq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87o9u8q4a5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83tw3xbklg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496480473 28531 195.159.176.226 (3 Jun 2017 09:01:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:01:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 03 11:01:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dH4vk-0007DB-UJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 11:01:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52983 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH4vq-0005nj-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH4v6-0005nd-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH4v5-0008Jk-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]:59049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH4v1-0008Ff-QS; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 05:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wfw5c73r4z1qs0L; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:00:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wfw5c3HD1z3jgXm; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:00:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmPf7vVaQK4a; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:00:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: i5aVpYp0ttv1TJAAPXb7HiaD5IJsas+d4elM2HIjTkmBrMQMO9kdSPudaszOtsh9 Original-Received: from linux.local (ppp-88-217-4-89.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.4.89]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E15541E56C2; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 11:00:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Is this "BIKINI BEACH"? In-Reply-To: <83tw3xbklg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:23:39 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215425 Archived-At: On Jun 03 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > + Lisp_Object object = Fnth (make_number (0), spec); > + Lisp_Object start = Fnth (make_number (1), spec); > + Lisp_Object end = Fnth (make_number (2), spec); > + Lisp_Object coding_system = Fnth (make_number (3), spec); > + Lisp_Object noerror = Fnth (make_number (4), spec); > > Isn't it simpler to use XCAR and XCDR here? Wouldn't it be even simpler to just pass each argument separately? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."