From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent vanilla Emacs Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:18:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8336814sbn.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgx34bb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="26524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stefankangas@gmail.com, "Nicolas P. Rougier" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 15 12:23:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZXUq-0006hr-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 12:23:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZXUp-0005Vn-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZXQA-0007ON-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:43237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZXQ9-0003PB-Ae; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id i15so2840671wrx.10; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=AVK6nqmthF1JtYcKTnqNjgF1qMkeYDI9sck5IK9XJ8M=; b=RrzbzHdqvXm+O1IfbKYfeQrnnd2q0N7bgRQxkHkjYmI5vnqJGJVlTjqFIxODK+kEG+ xEh5YjSdQpptj+zRpyNJzXZ69fGqyLVlxNmsoKQygSMtET2pp3ohINTghxUHwEloMI4A JmGt9AEIrCAM2pPjKKb9KxsvLy/3CcJU+VJDtSGBuqkkL2V9X5ekEKtJa53Ny1yIO0Xw QDgX53J9QX9hJKeqDyahQ0THNQul/7aEZTvPdi2njIBAjyS5+XiwrXD1QNYh1EOTTkaj rmCcSXGXpfUVcB3cqHDWpmZyHBfdU3NHomPG/NGfKU6B3k0sgbAj2A+Nr3C9lYCKUgpE JtTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=AVK6nqmthF1JtYcKTnqNjgF1qMkeYDI9sck5IK9XJ8M=; b=DSarKbBBanVqwVdBVRrZOUXbiTtyKrH3yFRhYeHr3+dIvDnCuYE8aRNSjfuHgrs1bM 3OrWnyrJrtYelRAhuxDNRpWvgczME4ChrJc2jI5TJKgTBcpRl/j1uKDugQciaRYKAVyV zbErH8Tv1RdKweNLqIZkgwBppdZWkxUdM8IPoX5U8QpCfsZKa4MPYIuoiji9b9q/tjez Mb2rEwdr39Sr7tvn2AN69SMbSe1Ccga9My6B/qL/oz/LxHrou73PHhoTjOpzkxXl0J0z 08+5lXc/6idoEuYj3ent4trE92dYosk66bGH1NfYzKqqNuka/Zi13TZc9gqTggxKPgIO +kzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vhcccHBWdqv2mI012e2J5FajX1oaQIvM8CeYsgw0o6KqRzGhp 72WTzXCsokI7dRm9MD2Nkbg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkYBXhnutMZkCcmZd0CG9ZV9uajVD8SumMdW7PuozEjxDzOBC+3ENgnlNHM2v6orfE6eZ/XQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:480a:: with SMTP id l10mr3424107wrq.318.1589537903344; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:2596:89e6:a99a:9ba2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm2909035wrn.10.2020.05.15.03.18.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 May 2020 03:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <83imgx34bb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 15 May 2020 13:01:12 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250375 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 15 May 2020 13:01:12 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: "Nicolas P. Rougier" >> Cc: Dmitry Gutov , stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:11:14 +0200 >> >> >> Can we instead choose a "decent" font among those installed and depending on >> the system? Or is it already the case? In my case (OSX), the chosen system font >> seems to be Monaco while the default system font is Menlo (or SF Mono if XCode >> installed). Would that be possible to have an ordered list of font to try? Eli> AFAIK, we already have that. If you want to propose a different order Eli> or changes to the set we use on macOS, please show a patch. I get Menlo from 'emacs -Q' on macOS, not sure why Nicolas would see anything different. Robert