From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Johan Vromans Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist. Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:41:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zmvu6ba2.fsf@xs4all.nl> <85ll7e68ei.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <854qe2ihhi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d5spxzml.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <85k6mxe686.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85pswp9hsu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114084242 5664 80.91.229.2 (21 Apr 2005 11:50:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 13:50:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOaBO-0001Fe-KI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:49:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOaG6-0002cQ-Db for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOaDO-0001iB-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOaDL-0001gH-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:51:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOaDK-0001AP-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:51:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.31] (helo=smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DOa6U-0006ZY-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:44:18 -0400 Original-Received: from phoenix.squirrel.nl (sioban.squirrel.nl [213.84.56.213]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3LBfjYS059863 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:41:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jv@squirrel.nl) Original-Received: by phoenix.squirrel.nl (Postfix, from userid 501) id 83FFC9DB07; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:41:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:56:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36226 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36226 Andreas Schwab writes: > David Kastrup writes: > I didn't blame anyone, it's just that both tex-mode and TeX-mode are > natural ways to name the mode for processing TeX input files, independent > of who is implementing it. AFAIK, no mode command uses capitalization. -- Johan