From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: thumbs.el and transparency Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:56:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17366.53124.274532.548329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <878xspwnjm.fsf@jurta.org> <87slqvfobk.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5hy43b6.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0b8lwhw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139615859 28562 80.91.229.6 (10 Feb 2006 23:57:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 11 00:57:14 2006 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F7i8X-0006vv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:57:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7i8X-0000ID-1J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7i8F-0000Hg-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:56:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7i8D-0000H1-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7i8C-0000Gy-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:56:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1F7iC5-0004EC-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F7i88-0002fw-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:56:48 +0100 Original-Received: from 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se ([82.182.110.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:56:48 +0100 Original-Received: from brakjoller by 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:56:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DvTdUiOEuy74F4BiqIIOZXYPU3s= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50337 Archived-At: "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > Since there are two thumbnail packages in Emacs, it would be double > effort to contribute to both. What do you think about idea to move > the basic things (like creation of thumbnail files to the same directory) > to thumbs.el, and leaving in tumme.el only advanced functionality? > > Do you mean, make tumme.el use thumbs.el for the simple stuff? > In theory, that is ok, but I don't know whether it is convenient. If we wanted to split tumme into smaller files, I guess we should move the tag functionality to tumme-tag.el, move image manipulation to tumme-manip.el and so on. But as long as the size of tumme is manageable, I think keeping it in one file is more convenient. I'm not keen on "littering" the file system with more files.