From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Tutorial incorrectly thinks emacs -Q uses customizations. Alarmist and confusing tutorial intro. Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:43:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45BBFE5A.20501@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169955854 16409 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2007 03:44:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Pretest-Bug , Drew Adams , Emacs-Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 28 04:44:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HB0xf-0005Eb-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:44:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HB0xf-0005Aq-8P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HB0xV-0005Af-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HB0xT-0005AN-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:44:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HB0xT-0005AD-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:43:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HB0xS-0006Em-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:43:59 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1143690ugf for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:43:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:to:cc:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-sa-exim-connect-ip:x-sa-exim-mail-from:x-spam-checker-version:x-spam-level:x-spam-status:subject:x-sa-exim-version:x-sa-exim-scanned:sender; b=JnQQRYil2C0It350bpMm8Onkzm5C3o6fz2BgZnb3UjxIh7E9F2Ezub1p4c9ww9DvGGinjoOvwNFKoPNkvn81n69RXRwwHtM2Hi2TJhWlcqubE+6U7jELsqD7PyJsPQhJHLtKKa/YcvQj4daT9U82dZ4IjYFybRZwmNUk2vdMq14= Original-Received: by 10.67.119.13 with SMTP id w13mr6744438ugm.1169955837846; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:43:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from chrislap.local ( [89.176.28.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e34sm6764561ugd.2007.01.27.19.43.56; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:43:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chrislap.local) by chrislap.local with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HB0xO-0001Sb-1q; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:43:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45BBFE5A.20501@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun\, 28 Jan 2007 02\:37\:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dooglus@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on chrislap.local) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65551 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:16840 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Drew Adams wrote: >> Clicking either of the "more info" links leads to further incorrect >> information... > Please tell what the incorrect information is. I'm guessing it's this: The default Emacs binding for the key is the command `backward-kill-word'. However, your customizations have rebound it to the command `nil'. "the command `nil'"? `nil' isn't a command!