From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:15:48 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <56103479.6090900@online.de> <87k2r31znz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443910563 15370 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2015 22:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 22:16:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 04 00:16:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV62-0003Xu-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 00:16:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40157 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV61-0005NM-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV5y-0005ND-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV5v-0005Wj-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]:34652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV5v-0005Wa-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so138634332pad.1 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=uyO7gBWRRhLIkZVb91RIC9vQkUXrfoHyb04y+0WU5VQ=; b=iNotzmxoepAwFXQomThItIKikPc0BdO3AQCwlP/jufxOfYfQ2LjYIpJQzkDEEeofP7 dSgpK3oJU+4jb98s7rVbKZzSz9p/N+Ua9Njw2O/rRXoIXyHlTOEE27hQnHHeicdnfznk dalQtAg2h+f08G6TuU9Tyo3R4E1Ejcc2O9T5wthfAkndUIBVBrOVSd9juLqx/QdouDMN TE9FGrBkTynnu19miD8nvNyJsqoZiRhfDfOXYJdEcTViHlIAH88/eD2K4snnG23Om2cz 5LgLXLw+YiKp/TXRGLZexnD66Ux2FQ/1HPLadUA/yfvzX8QjDJnhZ7kXcFtX7Ve8YMeH VF5g== X-Received: by 10.66.141.199 with SMTP id rq7mr29488668pab.140.1443910554423; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id su3sm19145526pbc.83.2015.10.03.15.15.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9E1B4F04DA2E; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:15:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sat, 3 Oct 2015 23:49:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190833 Archived-At: >>>>> Juanma Barranquero writes: > Perhaps we should leave non-software-related politics out of this > discussion. Reading "socialistic" as a pejorative could be a bit jarring for > some of us. Agreed, Juanma, with my apologies. I had meant to imply certain historical experiments with negative outcomes, but not to erase the positive aspects of socialism altogether. I'll refrain from such examples in the future. John