Unicode-2 version number

Unicode-2 version number

[Ulrich Mueller]

The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50, identical
with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily) possible to
have both installed in parallel.

Could this *please* be changed back to 23.0.0, or at least to some
number different from 23.0.50? (Multi-tty used to have 23.0.51, so
better avoid this one, too.)

Ulrich

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Leo]

On 2007-10-11 22:41 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50, identical
> with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily) possible to
> have both installed in parallel.

I think miles is syncing trunk to unicode2 for the time being. The
problem will go away once the merging conflicts are resolved.

> Could this *please* be changed back to 23.0.0, or at least to some
> number different from 23.0.50? (Multi-tty used to have 23.0.51, so
> better avoid this one, too.)
>
> Ulrich

-- 
.:  Leo  :.  [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ]  .:  [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ]  :.

       Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Miles Bader]

Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
>> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50, identical
>> with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily) possible to
>> have both installed in parallel.
>
> I think miles is syncing trunk to unicode2 for the time being. The
> problem will go away once the merging conflicts are resolved.

All changes you see in CVS are already "resolved" (even if they're not
correct :-).

In this case, I resolved it in favor of 23.0.50 because I think the
unicode branch should never have a version number _less_ than the trunk.

If this causes practical problems, I guess the unicode branch could be
bumped up to 23.0.51/52/something, I dunno.

-Miles

-- 
I'd rather be consing.

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Glenn Morris]

Miles Bader wrote:

> All changes you see in CVS are already "resolved" (even if they're
> not correct :-).
>
> In this case, I resolved it in favor of 23.0.50 because I think the
> unicode branch should never have a version number _less_ than the trunk.
>
> If this causes practical problems, I guess the unicode branch could be
> bumped up to 23.0.51/52/something, I dunno.

As far as I know, once the trunk and unicode branch are in sync (is
this true now?), unicode can just be merged to the trunk, so there'll
be no need for the unicode branch quite soon (?).

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg00180.html

  From: Richard Stallman
  Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?)
  Date:   Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:57:21 -04000

  What we need to do now is merge the multi-tty changes into the
  Unicode-2 branch, then install the Unicode-2 changes into the trunk.

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Stefan Monnier]

> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50, identical
> with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily) possible to
> have both installed in parallel.

Don't worry, AFAIK you can't compile this branch right now anyway.


        Stefan

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Stefan Monnier wrote:

>> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50,
>> identical with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily)
>> possible to have both installed in parallel.

> Don't worry, AFAIK you can't compile this branch right now anyway.

For sure the goal is that it can be compiled at some point? ;-)
And then a different version number (like 23.0.52) would come in
handy.

Ulrich

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <18191.28906.505457.667751@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> writes:

>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50,
>>> identical with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily)
>>> possible to have both installed in parallel.

> > Don't worry, AFAIK you can't compile this branch right now anyway.

> For sure the goal is that it can be compiled at some point? ;-)
> And then a different version number (like 23.0.52) would come in
> handy.

The variable mule-version of the trunk is "5.0 (SAKAKI)",
and that of emacs-unicode-2 is "6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)".  How
about using it to distinguish them?

---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Christian Faulhammer]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 745 bytes --]

Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>:

> > For sure the goal is that it can be compiled at some point? ;-)
> > And then a different version number (like 23.0.52) would come in
> > handy.
> The variable mule-version of the trunk is "5.0 (SAKAKI)",
> and that of emacs-unicode-2 is "6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)".  How
> about using it to distinguish them?

 We distinguish for the Gentoo packages by the "normal" version
number.  We would get thousands of bug reports if we call the package
emacs-cvs-23.0.52 (which is a live version) and the user sees 23.0.50
in the program he runs.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50,
>>> identical with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily)
>>> possible to have both installed in parallel.

>> Don't worry, AFAIK you can't compile this branch right now anyway.

> For sure the goal is that it can be compiled at some point? ;-)
> And then a different version number (like 23.0.52) would come in
> handy.

In the patch I've been working on to resolve the merge, one of the conflicts
is the version number and I resolved it by setting it arbitrarily at
23.0.60.


        Stefan

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Richard Stallman]

    > Don't worry, AFAIK you can't compile this branch right now anyway.

    For sure the goal is that it can be compiled at some point? ;-)

Even if it can't be compiled now, it should have a different version
number now, just to make things clear.

Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Richard Stallman]

    The version of the unicode-2 branch has changed to 23.0.50, identical
    with the trunk. Now it is no longer (at least not easily) possible to
    have both installed in parallel.

    Could this *please* be changed back to 23.0.0, or at least to some
    number different from 23.0.50? (Multi-tty used to have 23.0.51, so
    better avoid this one, too.)

We should keep the version numbers different as long as the unicode-2
branch is not dead.  Whatever the state of merging at any time,
it is better that they have different version numbers.

Would someone please change unicode-2's version back to what it was?