From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release tags Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:18:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <04A8931A-A044-4F8A-86FD-7AA70DA2B5E3@mit.edu> <87d32awhc7.fsf@gnu.org> <87wr0aldw0.fsf@gmail.com> <83pq62ec1i.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw6x505b.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx15lr1k.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87y5kpydsr.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4qga58n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346858320 4771 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2012 15:18:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 17:18:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T9HNE-0006S9-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:18:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59876 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9HN9-0000w2-3v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9HN1-0000vg-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9HMp-0006Ur-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:41775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9HMp-0006UU-Jb; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3XBpSx1vVJz3hhdM; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:18:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: weH9afBNlwYe+iKjMpMJv1nxx25R3M2BGyuj6fh3DIs= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-123-241.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.123.241]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3XBpSx0d8qzbbfV; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id BAD62CA2A5; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:18:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Nice decor! In-Reply-To: <87r4qga58n.fsf@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:55:52 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153050 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > Except when you merge that revision onto another branch, some here > seemed to be saying the tag would be merged with it, which makes no > sense to me, because after the merge what gets checked in should be a > different revision No, the merged revisions don't change. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."