From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Leaving out non-applicable commands on Mx Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:22:37 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87mvszdp6b.fsf@gnus.org> <8737u9kv6f.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87fuy7hdc6.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452299034 12953 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 00:23:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 01:23:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHhJt-00005s-Hx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 01:23:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHhJs-0003EZ-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHhJ9-0002Hv-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHhJ6-0006EH-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]:33701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHhJ6-0006Df-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e65so16539969pfe.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:23:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PZcUSdr+pa5ysvQAzSRulQjemNweRSPBWFw4WqGWn5U=; b=INvyaMeim32hkxL4DEb0ncqSrS77RtbWwdjbMN+WPJskGoEqjmTjus3SmLy2FGgmI4 STusNm2fDdELUZUUOPW+SfGSi5z6vLaAKLTLpr305O0pCjJPCaVLyg5VYz2oQ43dc91q ppKTN1yiCX0VMMQ/q7Li9QRna6b9skAIkgX7e/SAkakjEJqPbbaGRdSUWSIExix0kT5Y FzexN2L3+TsupO9qT242ROqjjIKBRRSI5KCH0e1mHs9W2h0Bbh0mLbSFSnflvEeMT5mI 4q0rIzgZu8rt/SH4lfyRkibIHrlzU6DNFd1MX+WgLx87KTBc+kylcEUPbxr4JqobjULO L6PA== X-Received: by 10.98.86.221 with SMTP id h90mr3069845pfj.97.1452298979717; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:22:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xi8sm169667091pab.9.2016.01.08.16.22.58 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:22:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A1BB21231D53D; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:22:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fuy7hdc6.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> (=?utf-8?Q?=22=C3=93scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:16:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197860 Archived-At: >>>>> =C3=93scar Fuentes writes: >> We've discussed before adding mechanisms for leaving mode-specific comma= nds >> out, but I was apparently the only one enthusiastic about it... > You sketched a possible implementation. If you are interested on completi= ng > the part that requires a smart hacker, I'll do the part that requires a d= umb > one :-) What is this feature suggestion again? --=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2