From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcre2el Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 23:11:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <877eedali3.fsf@web.de> <07D87DE6-CF97-404B-A550-431FBEC0EC18@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="33752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (darwin) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 08:11:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grdqd-0008dB-L7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 08:11:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grdqc-0006lV-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 02:11:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grdqW-0006lB-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 02:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grdqS-0006x3-CM; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 02:11:37 -0500 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:41835) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1grdqE-00050y-RL; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 02:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345F621F3D; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 02:11:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 02:11:22 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrkeelgddutdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufgjfffkfhgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpe dflfhohhhnucghihgvghhlvgihfdcuoehjohhhnhifsehgnhhurdhorhhgqeenucffohhm rghinhepnhgvfigrrhhtihhsrghnshdrtghomhenucfkphepjeeirddvfeegrdeiledrud egleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhohhhnfidomhgvshhmthhprghuthhh phgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqieekjeektdelgeegqddujeejheefkeduiedqjhhohhhnfi eppehgnhhurdhorhhgsehnvgifrghrthhishgrnhhsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from localhost (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net [76.234.69.149]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BC62C10314; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 02:11:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2019 23:34:30 -0500") Mail-Followup-To: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233075 Archived-At: >>>>> "RS" == Richard Stallman writes: RS> As a general question, is it a good idea to keep packages in ELPA which RS> are not maintained? Perhaps in some cases that is ok and in others that is RS> not. If they continue to work without much intervention, I don't see much harm in it. We don't advertise ELPA as being "curated, maintained packages" do we? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2