From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:51:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200906133719.cu6yaldvenxubcqq.ref@Ergus> <20200906133719.cu6yaldvenxubcqq@Ergus> <83lfhnnew7.fsf@gnu.org> <20200906163418.3p2wuygb4osm76wa@Ergus> <20200906203807.u237c3h22oxwtmba@Ergus> <87tuwabm5a.fsf@gnus.org> <9fb02447-6189-490f-a6ee-3d037492e0e6@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16976"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Drew Adams , Emacs developers To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 16:52:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNvx-0004LE-8E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:52:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNvw-0002Py-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:52:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNup-0000wr-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:51:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:50239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNun-0002Mz-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id e17so341782wme.0 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:51:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qt/6U4jjOKoIMi2eLKBLuY90RDB6uLNANrZhiefYArc=; b=bU5G+Owv4k7RmslB9uGfOCIb/z8oLKH9Nj91OlljHpBmf2VxexRjRPcec/iyL84iHO HB8PVoLNbO4UkCulJgU8Aiatflb7QRopXFECtddxw0OO7Qi0Cl+mq4ICpJDYZAAizjv4 zPOoUEFb73NMhEMuwtmBy+QyAMmkL8lz1Gk7f0OGWnIdWnu/ynZK4ADw5ZbYK/OxzQiW 2VqZJUVVedQC3RTw1MDNmZ8ZUbo1ITncdsZGJSljC+ChkpHiJS2OUY/D4SNahYLBOk6j rLTguayiWYU09Ecdma09J4bgC/jC647pIgvi/z3OpP2Oh7Wyq5M0S8Z+vnzzW3AIcWE6 qxvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qt/6U4jjOKoIMi2eLKBLuY90RDB6uLNANrZhiefYArc=; b=CVSUAeVZNtzCJYB2Ji4LS8pc4g5KGx8vzPu4VjY1BKfxLXpuhpcAvgnO9h8YrKZfj9 hJz4IwsS4FxB4C7SdUyzn4CQC9nXxqQf5wa3afFSaZPcO2PwyUKkFj9ezAAwR3v8Qx1U LuQGJoEavnOOT8g+kENN8oE2kK1jOyt0KzsVZh+dNmk29a+Y8D0e6C3WhFl6dpciBslk zNQlafvTkbtiLpgWNFQxxgAd+sztGnVdcYR/M90FEnvD824KUVg9AufkZGaKysBw9Vyh gkZxJTxAD8YnFQsZtobBhf/OXKmymzY4iBmN1WmQrQfN5VOzFkAB13atavnrtOhG+Aol 9efw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jmioIwUWa01X/s/g1eTL1KP+/XPE4Wfrfrp4dggcBera5YWcc /TTvFm0mUqwzBCqH5MF9JG/7CB5x9JA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLTYdPqt0sq0+8i/RJyVuOgGA+32n8CwfT+4Gy4yA+VhgqU3ZX0mH2UOCpAgWRbJOsm6MeWg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf36:: with SMTP id m22mr378929wmg.51.1599749467316; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:8c16:d3f4:7c3b:1764]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v17sm9900277wrc.23.2020.09.10.07.51.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:51:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:16:45 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::335; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x335.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255006 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:16:45 +0000, Gregory Heytings sa= id: >>=20 >>> In fact not adding a Reply-To would be perfect, at least for >>> me. Presumably someone who sends a message to a list has subscribed >>> to the list, of if they are not, it's common to mention explicitly >>> that they are not. >>=20 >> That works if their email address is mentioned in one of the headers >> of the message, but in this case yours wouldn=CA=BCt be >>=20 Gregory> Hmmm... Why should my address be mentioned in one of the heade= rs of Gregory> the message? A "From emacs-devel@gnu.org To emacs-devel@gnu.o= rg" or a Gregory> "From emacs-devel@gnu.org To Cc emacs-devel@gnu.org"= would Gregory> be perfectly fine. There is no need (in my case at least) to = add a Gregory> "Reply-To". Yes, but you get mail sent to emacs-devel. Not everyone who sends to emacs-devel is subscribed to it, nor do they all read it via gmane.io like I do (or some other method of getting it). The polite assumption is to CC the originator of the message, just in case, which is what Drew did. Robert