From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: "Nicolas P. Rougier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent vanilla Emacs Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 05:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8336814sbn.fsf@gnu.org> <83imgx34bb.fsf@gnu.org> <20200515213519.GA55337@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="22345"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 26.3 Cc: Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , dgutov@yandex.ru To: Alan Third Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 16 05:34:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZnaW-0005io-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 05:34:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33938 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZnaV-0006PU-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZnZr-0005n0-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:8644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZnZp-0002zR-UV; Fri, 15 May 2020 23:33:31 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,397,1583190000"; d="scan'208";a="348793417" Original-Received: from 91-160-114-139.subs.proxad.net (HELO M-E7-NPR.local) ([91.160.114.139]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 May 2020 05:33:25 +0200 In-reply-to: <20200515213519.GA55337@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.104; envelope-from=nicolas.rougier@inria.fr; helo=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/15 23:33:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -68 X-Spam_score: -6.9 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250442 Archived-At: I'm using the mac port version, that might be the reason. Nicolas Alan Third writes: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:18:21PM +0200, Robert Pluim wrote: >> >>>>> On Fri, 15 May 2020 13:01:12 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> >> >> From: "Nicolas P. Rougier" >> >> Cc: Dmitry Gutov , stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:11:14 +0200 >> >> >> >> >> >> Can we instead choose a "decent" font among those installed and depending on >> >> the system? Or is it already the case? In my case (OSX), the chosen system font >> >> seems to be Monaco while the default system font is Menlo (or SF Mono if XCode >> >> installed). Would that be possible to have an ordered list of font to try? >> >> Eli> AFAIK, we already have that. If you want to propose a different order >> Eli> or changes to the set we use on macOS, please show a patch. >> >> I get Menlo from 'emacs -Q' on macOS, not sure why Nicolas would see >> anything different. > > Me too. I believe the Mac port uses Monaco (and possibly versions of > the NS port which date to before Apple changed the default system > font).