From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange message from "bzr pull" Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:37:50 -0200 Message-ID: References: <877hs5ogv8.fsf@red-bean.com> <83my11ejmr.fsf@gnu.org> <87aax1mxh6.fsf@red-bean.com> <83hbr9eha3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262178502 993 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2009 13:08:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 30 14:08:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPyHd-0000gi-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPyHd-0002yQ-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:08:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPyCR-0000aP-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:02:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPyCN-0000Xn-2s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:02:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59368 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPyCM-0000Xf-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:02:47 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:42926) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPyC5-0002Z7-3V; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from vpn-132-204-232-59.acd.umontreal.ca (vpn-132-204-232-59.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.59]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBUD2MUC027686; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: by vpn-132-204-232-59.acd.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 501) id D53D23D9FB2; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:37:50 -0200 (ARST) In-Reply-To: <83hbr9eha3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:01:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (darwin) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.5, RV3437=0 X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119038 Archived-At: > OK. So, since we have this tree in trunk/, what are the reasons to > keep it pristine, again? IOW, why not make quick and simple fixes in > it directly, instead of in another branch? No reason. You can work just with the trunk if you want. That is actually closer to what you'd do with CVS. Stefan