From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposed new core library: alert.el Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:20:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87io5g2po3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y4ec19gm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83a8qrsatb.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnb716um.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83mvurqg5m.fsf@gnu.org> <87twozyu8l.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446872314 31745 80.91.229.3 (7 Nov 2015 04:58:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 04:58:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 07 05:58:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuva5-0002yz-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2015 05:58:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuva4-0002Je-Q0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 23:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zuva0-0002JF-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 23:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuvZw-0002uj-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 23:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]:35205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuvZw-0002ud-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 23:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so146719511pas.2 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 20:58:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references:user-agent :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=YaHiBP//HbxAeLAZ82cSOMED8z+jEydMqBmzHLXtAyY=; b=izFi6gdRcdnM9fzy7s67R0xUqKcowauCaW49Zlt4Jo8/GRPSSx2YJtOUCed/Z/IS1t cF/5VpRPxZfBHr0VkoR76o+uLxjgRY5M1HtW6NZecISfCT3/8aIuLspvT5U7otfPKZw6 ZQsOfvc42mKMvmlqE1hl90jAxcuuNl6pu00y6T+EbobQ8rdwHyGY4kGetWFwF/RWQ4dY ioQE5x9OLNwegSSBr5t7FroUA5QEpDr2gNxtZ8OOd+VXkYhhMi9fGIgJaAfGO/ECAEsZ 6I5OTD8Fw8oFORE4UtksFTcIhP2omgdp4l206xAN4qLtgI9Hw90tdGvOp7SsdLsVoNp4 nB1g== X-Received: by 10.68.135.73 with SMTP id pq9mr22780873pbb.53.1446872295377; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 20:58:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes-2.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fp2sm3048725pbb.34.2015.11.06.20.58.13 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Nov 2015 20:58:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes-2.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9A2D348F8001; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 20:58:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87twozyu8l.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:20:58 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193488 Archived-At: >>>>> Ted Zlatanov writes: > I just saw it, thank you. I think they are similar enough that it doesn't > matter much which one we use, and my proposal is slightly simpler. So unless > you have strong feelings about it, let's go with mine? At this point I think we have three proposals, so if we still don't have consensus by the weekend, let's use the new Emacs Wiki Proposals index to summarize the alternatives for people to review. John