From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] Honor 'SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH' when generating autoloads. Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:00:49 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87k2ph3mgx.fsf@gnu.org> <87io4lnkyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtwoktg.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5gkakj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8pwoesc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448909652 30188 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2015 18:54:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , alezost@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 19:54:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3TaR-00078R-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:54:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3TaQ-0004FC-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:54:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57915) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3TZq-00042f-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3TZp-0006ch-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:53:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]:36789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3TZo-0006av-0u; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: by qkda6 with SMTP id a6so62684130qkd.3; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=gVY1ZbvJcKrdOKHiZera2qYfH/J9/LyeQpjQlsrPcbA=; b=liZjwbExMeOqCIXVHiHA4Pej/Jup/Pptb+6wbcskWVob4wwM5xPaoRXiUvFo6/BZhn hU8EM3Fps5+KGFyrdfyOWu1wPr+qMqSf55CLHtzcN82oicut2mZ1esfAU95hnFxkDWdG mPpvrcUJz+gbroszOXgHRrwJF38yluow7tMnLh+fTVjkE2RKGbCEvOEeSXV27Wjnxrn8 HcOYWJZLuICmgV4b0x4oS+D9KUy1LUdG8MNJCSjYDmAS2DUUQofkRTbWiiXm+5iMEtuY USjxrutiBU+Ch7X4+cP7Pve1XV7VGMOcXeGR4+Cj1YSwmpugE3E6c2DGXmQ5HYle2aKL Ff2A== X-Received: by 10.55.72.3 with SMTP id v3mr51514380qka.107.1448909607709; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:53:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes-2.local (mail.johnwiegley.com. [208.82.103.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18sm15449011qkt.26.2015.11.30.10.53.22 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:53:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes-2.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 840354A4EA78; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:51:17 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <83a8pwoesc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:12:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=), emacs-devel@gnu.org, alezost@gmail.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195634 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This is obviously the first patch of a series. It does not make Emacs >> itself bit-reproducible, but it makes Emacs packages bit-reproducible. > I'd prefer to have the whole series, to see where this is going, and then > commit them in one go. But that's me. John? Yes, I too would like to see this evolve on a feature branch until the whole series is ready, after which Eli and I can review before moving into master. How does that sound, Alex, Ludovic? John