From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20201009134249.15265.31644@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20201009134252.81B3620A15@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83tuv35upc.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7r26037.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29901"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 12 10:21:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kRt4l-0007Xv-Mw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:20:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRt4k-0004QK-Oy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRt3V-0003UW-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:19:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:40002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRt3U-0006Kp-3r; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:19:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id k18so16638027wmj.5; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:19:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/d0+j5lQoxkMcSL4SBALM30jB/lji76qNrXbJRSzApc=; b=pUtIYKNjH8R4AhOao34SvOlYx5LR5qVW4VHFVFifRoBOYpzVKsAkxmI+G9gG2qCqUU W4NFENFT7b4HoLeFEwmPbFSwFM+0QBlRKndsEZzplHdSU5eKJaDxlq+hjxlBpZ3u/4qK nIwuQt2S+GUGSoP1f0+6FYDLaYI3wnmaN8RhBFYEde7D0PaP+Pt4ZSo/vZHspIPlxuI6 5h5eN70DTM7Dks6cR54lNOScOSOTYkIkfXk1shaOi8OYOqRxxWyDZ8nxWtxjwHeXsypX F1egdfNboxYQ+oBQShUz/ShiVOMHHsA2CjOaBCNe1b6JOfNl2UOUGl1ojOKsnk+tA86j 7lNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/d0+j5lQoxkMcSL4SBALM30jB/lji76qNrXbJRSzApc=; b=gQINtfFO55UYqt7ah94pQ6FmzD6oWCgUrom7RBrCOypdXJtyVQMFkVeA1A7etHyLlC g+B7UAGJ9E5RJkIkrBz78X9az7JttdFQWQe43NwxxfOJnNY1zMIwyTh3zDjJG1QDTbGP pbCdCe/CrGtmRlKs/hvU9J2eUkrL6yjnmi1OCiq5F132FmW7YyY39yhN5So8+5NTHq1U ggV/qo1WyebXiDH6WJi3B5je+HYapl3BwHZa37GF14MYoJ7TiswxIPb+/bpHF4eNIFxd UhtE7yOYd4a0fqHG7lSf2oplHVxZK8m8UMx8IL38N5wIC1KQaQuTPPeAiomhdbO3YyOz 7G0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Wu20INCG9qSebxjyrYt9Imj3pIr2wd5OjF9JdHUQGDAq4iyqK XQHFs/RXc3JNRKTNMJeosAfDApq5uoU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGnyfCu+wJE63ikTVM2A76sr2XCFSZ3zuqD6WUqM010B958Ine3xZGk1/PO4roEhpvbXyMzg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6302:: with SMTP id x2mr10284490wmb.121.1602490776880; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:2989:6e8d:76df:f4ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm2089372wmf.45.2020.10.12.01.19.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 01:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2020 01:14:40 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257452 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 01:14:40 -0700, Stefan Kangas = said: Stefan> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>> But it is true that it would be preferable if the code matched the >>> documentation. In the interest of consistency we are better off >>> sticking to one spelling. Note that we already had around 40 other >>> instances of "parsable" in our source tree. >>=20 >> Since renaming symbols involves some pain, do we really need to be >> 100% consistent here? Stefan> I personally don't have a very strong opinion either way, FWIW. I think I prefer consistency between the docstrings and the associated code to global consistency, and changing code is always risky, so I=CA=BCd prefer if the docstrings were changed back. Robert --=20