From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrii Kolomoiets Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:27:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20201031194419.GC5887@ACM> <834kmago8m.fsf@gnu.org> <20201031203914.GD5887@ACM> <835z6ogc1h.fsf@gnu.org> <20201101195313.GA6190@ACM> <83sg9rd6cp.fsf@gnu.org> <20201102185147.GC7297@ACM> <83mtzzd0s3.fsf@gnu.org> <20201103210853.GA21923@ACM> <83ft5pax2p.fsf@gnu.org> <20201104173954.GA14535@ACM> <83v9ed3nbw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , enometh@meer.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 18:33:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXW3-0008cj-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:33:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXW2-0000Pe-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:33:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXQu-0005za-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:27:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]:34889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXQs-0006mj-Bt; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:27:52 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id a25so9834204lfb.2; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Cr3G1hwVdDrZrxw3Ioq6o4JhzY46pDwzLrBNjgyCXng=; b=iN9pkbzp1qVMS/hS5+nGWrQ4VaqZ8zH5aRwwZ9NUYgF/tK0tv+UuIy0p97rQWvdZSJ YzblR5/pTPgSzbRNWb/P978T8m43mYjxgLM2B3KJ0S8Vg9iTgWvwIKUjkkpxIaEIuaqL 2OK4JzL1pg1dXznLPpHKyBsEr6Ky3yeaJF5lvHxCdTR2CsFrTY1CRtG0jRXe3D7XGest xMc5zBejONA1rflT2L+5mYBw9+6Jn62vwLdQIaTxn3YvLBRNoyg8D5i95gbMyMAlIH0W vjhQTFWk2EAqOnxrEOWgHgdFRtnl1dXC2qM4vYxxbC0/8im64xo6dpZzvoqcGv4wiVsh YudA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Cr3G1hwVdDrZrxw3Ioq6o4JhzY46pDwzLrBNjgyCXng=; b=IsIYTGFyoxbqG7PyXKT+EJY+3JkTZc29y31b8CD5dO2ZBrGVT8E5OetAkrb2pGabUj rBznuM6B1QmXJYjoY+A7eXek0QULzrXssHwpqLCFW3mNY2IkvBnlzzZeQk4j8cx/XtsD 9pNL3mq8xUb0azY1hFMZE8DJETPzN+VYXaUoGYq9/9Z/GoPlxhyYptNGygot4QF6N206 Qn+jG3rhG4GuCRXq+SMLY3PPTN/mXGrO+Aq3j8w6Z1RFweYjwwwrJLX4X9Y1rFRLxJ6B KzV4kzcFFmTU3+u2SWaDNvkmPSRvifdk0YoL3kLhueGhoDuUdmnYdZk9DGdqENDBdc8O oUuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Z3kcBa0gY5HkVhW2jEZJb9E3wrhlCIBgidYgE8DWgLm8NhuVt qmxM6uTM2un2GIAcxhDvQlU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYgs6hBlmlfbJ+Ci6TZTLq+N+uuZ8DEogAhOEg8WGgCGk1bqSNGW1n0uR9CkUqU3Wwrco+lg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:c714:: with SMTP id x20mr5162064lff.537.1605029268062; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f62sm1626382lfd.144.2020.11.10.09.27.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:21:10 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12e; envelope-from=andreyk.mad@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12e.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258981 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Does anyone else think this is common usage, to have a minibuffer-only frame >> while other frames also have minibuffers? > > FWIW, I've never seen it in the wild (I've seen mixes of frames with > and without minibuffers, but when there is a minibuffer-only frame > never seen it accompanied with other frames-with-minibuffer, except for > frames on other terminals). I don't sure what the "in the wild" means, but I know at least two packages that shows minibuffer-only child frame on reading user input: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/honmaple/emacs-maple-minibuffer/master/maple-minibuffer.el https://raw.githubusercontent.com/muffinmad/emacs-mini-frame/master/mini-frame.el