From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Another menu question - , and Date: 29 Jun 2005 21:56:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42C066BE.6010800@student.lu.se> <42C07B6F.8060208@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120075255 16948 80.91.229.2 (29 Jun 2005 20:00:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 22:00:53 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dniio-0002GW-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:59:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dniqu-000677-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dniop-0005WQ-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dnioh-0005S8-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dnioh-0005Lu-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dnilp-00061x-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DniZV-0000eP-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:50:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se ([82.182.110.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:50:09 +0200 Original-Received: from brakjoller by 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:50:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1-1-3-38a.gml.gbg.bostream.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39903 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39903 Eli Zaretskii writes: > Because the code that generates the menus works like that. I think it > takes the last key binding for the function and displays that. > Perhaps if we reverse the order of key bindings, we will get a better > result (F20). > > > Is not those C-w (and what more???) better candidates? > > But C-w invokes a different function. Hmm... Currently I am running Emacs 21.3 on GNU/Linux and I see C-w, M-w and C-y for Cut, Copy and Paste in the Edit menu. This is what Lennart wants I guess. Why is this different on w32 (if it *is* different)?