From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:58:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86il063imh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjqghyd.fsf@gmail.com> <86zfti101u.fsf@gnu.org> <87pluegd4z.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttjp20je.fsf@gnu.org> <87y191fwnd.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyqcfv6k.fsf@gmail.com> <86o79wzi31.fsf@gnu.org> <86mspgza23.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5lgz7qa.fsf@gnu.org> <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 26 14:59:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s0LAr-0005rK-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:59:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0LAR-0000cG-2W; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0LAJ-0000YR-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0LAH-0005Qm-Uv; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a5872b74c44so245568766b.3; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:58:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714136335; x=1714741135; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wraHrDBwJjUrRoXD203cnenMpdPyxNsvk8uEhJOl2b4=; b=jVsY/mXr5Tt9nAP9Ow5sWQYXkG7KdcyLYXySz9PNiHB5UtaiMxxFoCH9+UfInPKe/V 1HziQZ+XBPm1mln8RRgfzUXyMni5tbtzUhKv/AQ11+DXxMGZtXi4oNda9Z4ek//kCgqy eNxgu6H4sSgee3qvDpAKtKObuaL6CFRdRiHdT+6mq35UGrF8vFliXVsOrGZo1nosrdQJ yF+SLLSscWfOQ58R7iIDtUJKHgcTzEEeniPFKsI2YCaI8O6zHTxWQe2S4V3sAMdSQ9bg 3oMW9/OAnLq+pb3PW1L1z4pWEdS9hMfszA9hh28TVFxQe37E1vMbbIgTde9LcoYOdyuA CPyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714136335; x=1714741135; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=wraHrDBwJjUrRoXD203cnenMpdPyxNsvk8uEhJOl2b4=; b=RlxP/Ijnkt2gH7BCSNae+rLvhk8L8WLwoc1QF/vUU+E/U7teEj7mrycJtKyiEkfaLy Hw+9ZrCb+fURg2V2NEAwtYRclZrHykW6IbBHaZ96NGxxzT1oMHZIojqjTlGUrM+bTX2q J1u9Awqrt/EAxStiHAGzjXSU/CpzpGRdEASJcbOocTzh+UFRe4ByyP/GUiZDVbHsJ3ef eY9DgGTMOxO1rbNGHs636Jq18nlFvLlnd6U5i+0mM5czatzEoAgysmeQ62TzGZXZcj7b ypTHsT/SkvSQ+y4Mzg3JjubnYkPQ0OksdpCt1C02cJhJh9cuN3FfqEk3Kk6kyu/YcORB sTQA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV6AnVz9EAYxejKN3RCjUEAVxJn9rJfCnaA1rtjZ8mkT1mZew5rlfdFMiUI/leHRsOWcNOvqlaYG5uD8DKrcxB5FIMl X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzRZ5ZmBUaLLxjD17EuejK9hspYSIPLOpLJHQqan2RIPWpCjdG/ RWpGqeDy/6hgxA5sEe1wdxuD8xoOCjbbSzAMCVWsHCsUEZs+ENJrbo1j3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZ/kQAzP+Fv2EGd4dHDru83GLk22qXTVhGvgt8lsVoj91ZiDvYuwuVE/GgIaY8TtLWSKOByw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:351b:b0:a52:24b7:b4fc with SMTP id r27-20020a170906351b00b00a5224b7b4fcmr2015533eja.72.1714136335125; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a4eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.164.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ak1-20020a170906888100b00a55b93c5cddsm5782150ejc.109.2024.04.26.05.58.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:38:20 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62b; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318129 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> In any case, I asked about the downsides of calling igc_postmorten, >> which I think is crucial to understand for making this decision. If >> there are no significant downsides, then doing so is a net win, no? > > Isn't the downside that GC will never function again, and become unsafe > to invoke, after a call to igc_postmortem? With the result that the > debuggee will not be usable as an editor, or indeed operate reliably at > all, after bt is called? > > https://memory-pool-system.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topic/arena.html#c.mps_arena_postmortem Exactly!