From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 a9c48d5: Additional fixes for file notification Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:42 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20160222175244.30186.2617@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87k2lwv5ob.fsf@gmx.de> <87egc4v4hs.fsf@gmx.de> <8bd4ec21-1306-41bf-aca7-5571a3014337@default> <87r3g4js64.fsf@gmail.com> <2b98a5dd-7f46-4e92-9398-ede070c261de@default> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456772605 1470 80.91.229.3 (29 Feb 2016 19:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers , Kaushal Modi , Michael Albinus , Stefan Monnier , Oleh Krehel To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 29 20:03:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aaT63-0007xV-AO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:03:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaT62-0005Uy-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaSrI-0005ox-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:47:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaSrF-0001qn-8A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:47:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]:34706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaSrE-0001qZ-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:47:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id fy10so96247741pac.1 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=Qiw2pBAjWxtqRkN29x3NboxbqONoSlQu8aKaW35K5f0=; b=G8G2xGtiz9S3Giv9v2IsFmJhjzVUhJDPuH1CWfvMWBs28E4Du9O63YyRZZzzRrxQyn CDLURS8yK/gv5qReNHlh3eHfx4+rPsuu5MMZ0odIwQReZh7kVfI9WeBJojuVZVPPo2/M YISM/Yl/cvpp0Q7M1WsJO+LYZF053RF8M8hi70ECnwRocCwvezzDPuOZND3vtJOQQBWv /nCJjQyPbkk97s0yUBxN0cppQPyxe0RzoIL0n/AdW0NQRCv5UiS6hSrxwSpVrl8AXIfl njVoq9qjUCbPKsASYV9kEzAA5WX/6B5CTYIJdUblmGRIDxVVcKBvn7myLbYY2DKaNGb9 XwAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=Qiw2pBAjWxtqRkN29x3NboxbqONoSlQu8aKaW35K5f0=; b=R6e8BQMgm9H+NvY59ZfwBzBeX6dzYWyosAXFbh2mTMiL1zTbZtJ71Dvf1DZVn/iiY3 2ONSTzJLzXiB4A0qxDgZensobOkygNsa8jb++0lq/wuofoXc8bAeSxqUH699CrfLbdtZ 2z/DFp/rME7ZgmWGvmjxwPgDxY9huT6rb6IzfAp/PS7KIVOlZEnNAmhC0zCKw/dXH6Je k+tDdeNOmhJT6NAPMc08A6QpGoXly6VNKYcdqQ0uqnIeKij5EQ+sWGMFfmR53wq+LNAO jNMneaMWxd/PhyPmeacZSdkSMUnitP7IYWQe+fWl34GY6Gt9y3/FarWwvYMhDd3x/zBd SPvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKp00lJRq2oSnS/n63t+Lo2Fl7pmyE4P4fVdKQlDwjTYxPPiTMjlpd70pWZ1RWd7A== X-Received: by 10.66.228.97 with SMTP id sh1mr23901941pac.77.1456771668193; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm39807117pfm.10.2016.02.29.10.47.46 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: John Wiegley Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 602E6132696CC; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:11:10 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.91 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Drew Adams , Stefan Monnier , Oleh Krehel , Kaushal Modi , Michael Albinus , Emacs developers X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200821 Archived-At: >>>>> Drew Adams writes: > But if there is a good reason for that, fine. I don't have a problem with > putting it in a library that uses a prefix for everything - as long as the > prefix is not `cl-'. I really don't see why `cl-' would not be reserved for > emulation of Common Lisp constructs (and their implementations). I think you've swayed me by your arguments for consistency, Drew. I tend to fear being unnecessarily rigid in things, but sloppiness does not serve us either. If there are functions in cl-*.el that have nothing to do with the advertised purpose of the cl modules, then maybe it would be better to have another module for them to live in. Can you please re-open the issue? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2