From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New ELPA policy proposal Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:24:15 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <87611bh19q.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <83vb9bm9tp.fsf@gnu.org> <87lha6e2n1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447170575 15877 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 15:49:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 16:49:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBAl-0001fG-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:49:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33272 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBAl-0007Fj-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwAc9-0002oA-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwAc8-0004sg-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]:33170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwAc5-0004rY-49; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so237130530pab.0; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:13:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=7xuDy0jLBX0VavQYlJSX7Z6+Ltuop2PwLJZeKrjPzTg=; b=s+DifXV9DOQAll50MRdJE2CljcSWSP6luxDi2SBuBWZcneDN2428zG+cy6mPLHkk+G r/1P5q5cHUocWPcK8nPhm9CNtbzBxYym5SFZbHHsJUUDNsQ4Dr4i+ebLoSRwZjJmIzxM 4C6LPBW03Me2TKfXGwZN2JzvWvGFytbt0bMb2q/1uYwL9Y1nfJUbe6a6z8OIkSANOlpc 33/HK76WnaUMv5SgXDpn9qKYDpzaGPb4HghPHQdJsD92kBRr2ulfSxwr+R5k2dFSlZs3 f+plSvao6iUllefhOir1ruciOQL/3DlqesEh7Hm9SpCnPGvSVDTdfSumhCuxQCqVwzWG CFHA== X-Received: by 10.68.133.230 with SMTP id pf6mr6537785pbb.31.1447168416460; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:13:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id it10sm4670713pbc.14.2015.11.10.07.13.35 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:13:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2DA731050EAE5; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:13:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lha6e2n1.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleh Krehel's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:26:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Oleh Krehel , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193871 Archived-At: >>>>> Oleh Krehel writes: >> Why not have only one distribution, the full one? > If fine with it, if that's what we agree upon. Some people might still care > about bandwidth. I don't. But we do offer emacs-24.5.tar.gz and > emacs-24.5.tar.xz variants currently, I assume it's for the purposes of > bandwidth. I'd be fine with just one "full distribution" too, unless there are other strong objections. It ought to be a difference of tens of megabytes at most. John