From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freezes and Emacs 25 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:05:38 -0800 Message-ID: References: <5625B166.3080104@dancol.org> <86zizdczhp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2pvqg0l.fsf@gnu.org> <837fluqkd1.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaf1s82r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r3jwdp3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447290396 16823 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2015 01:06:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 02:06:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwgLO-0008Tx-A5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:06:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43844 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwgLN-0006Hr-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:06:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwgKx-0006H9-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwgKj-0000go-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]:36442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwgKj-0000gZ-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so46744082pac.3 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:05:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=zUB8Wg1BzTs8ISbMxGz+UUBRKC6zPUSa12cYaR6Txgo=; b=GwLIdEQUF9wZxyXnXkJ/gd4htFJ+slxGBNL6vnFuUuYXRzhdMpNaHA5UXOrm1RiryI 2hqXLOb/efC8StrJQFZEhac9GFYG87k7/nxU/JplslXjULd6MCu3CP4xXlpC97gFk8TZ vSn2Q0In5PkMx52fND1J2+9GT/8grcqHF3p54Gyy9KcgsFeB8ciAFdPuNMHLNzW24olI 2+t/Igm0WoBbpr1GCh3RtoVXS3kfty8cEl6HH6WXgC/GKXH21CzXQ0DbcnUYufsQ+eFd DuPOYfeuhFj/dKtEFtOeHpauUmB6oe9O8MKJ0IlPKCExchOm6T69bWSjvRNkhP6SQhQV CENQ== X-Received: by 10.66.232.170 with SMTP id tp10mr18851486pac.38.1447290348636; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:05:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cs7sm11531803pad.35.2015.11.11.17.05.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:05:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4A2651056C44E; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:05:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r3jwdp3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:43:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194184 Archived-At: >>>>> Juri Linkov writes: > Also in the next release I'd like to see improvements in the Isearch prompt > listed in the proposal Artur published on EmacsWiki, but it seems it's > impossible to reach consensus in a reasonable time before the next release > due to a wide spectrum of opinions, so perhaps Isearch prompt changes need > to wait for 25.2. I agree. 25.2 won't be that long after 25.1, so this shouldn't sound like a kiss of death. John