From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rudolf Schlatte Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3169cdcdbc4@heytings.org> <9088e12cb3a70cbf66aa@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25320"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:VZEeOSDlB83U74C0vxT5sD1aMPI= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 10:02:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOGRt-0006Ta-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:02:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60150 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOGRs-0000Gh-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOGPw-00080J-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:49776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOGPt-0004An-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 05:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOGPq-0004Oz-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:00:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266738 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: >> >> So is the plan to readd keybindings center-FOO? >> > > There is no clear predefined plan, just some ideas I'm currently > experimenting with. [...] > C-o is not at all "hitting the trash can", at the moment there is > nothing more than a proposal to conduct an experiment to make a > (small?) change to its meaning. Could you maybe repeat what change is planned? I looked at the proposed patch and it seems to only remove the C-o keybinding. Apologies if the proposal was posted already; I don't assume the plan is to leave C-o unbound? Since I use C-o frequently, I'm curious what will happen when my fingers press it while editing text, and to what extent I will have to reconfigure standard Emacs keybindings (which is something I try to avoid).