From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Forwording symbols Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:16:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87jziod6yc.fsf@gmail.com> <874j9rcuf6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y173bda9.fsf@gmail.com> <87plsfbcd5.fsf@gmail.com> <87iky6boz7.fsf@gmail.com> <878qz2bh3u.fsf@gmail.com> <87le3282mh.fsf@gmail.com> <87le2z4rzg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33821"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Emacs Devel , Eli Zaretskii To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 17:17:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sKJXF-0008hB-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:17:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKJWZ-0003PF-9u; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKJWI-0003LP-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKJWG-00074h-JJ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42249a4f9e4so7791225e9.2; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718896570; x=1719501370; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=l6pIvKh4Vys4iPWnfi/3qK/OUex3h6lTw7r6t2xCcnk=; b=Br8qOyZqqhxVhj6PDEZ3MMwULest4sJMX37lKf5t++bCXRFeCtZcbR6h+0I74TwRGU 2cSrMSKgnf2rfBVTux6vTdBpy4wn1fFk/KEPGGKwiE68j+yEl520c0uyRjqS2ZRht7GY qotamb5JFVKAhxEqzuWuuxz0dbVuk++TmUAWP19/jxVXludnD17kQqC9jtqfbPjUvQY5 n4SOIz8VG9Ry88AJ4JiIHlvFb6CqRjOoHISPj2cCWQQ7Co6Vu88S5z0uuOhHooESWrn2 A9ahG6pX8dhJSdJIunaKqy6bGupJt/DjUpRUxbZbeb26XKo1uvmdEel3C999OxsEU2A9 Okdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718896570; x=1719501370; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l6pIvKh4Vys4iPWnfi/3qK/OUex3h6lTw7r6t2xCcnk=; b=YYPdkSDY/jiPwJYmz+cmLx7tTSw8vIeOUPqeRyRHee1wjRPDttmI1/+/MuQ1/lhZB/ YEjeIraO8xt/jZiKqOd8LjdmHbIO4JvIeprKuiMgPeKaD89t050xqxq43TnDgjzMWtXX DfBQHLSzz1eBH5Fd1HOgkOo7DF0vjAgP15YGhxEmiely5iwTvdyON9p9ixcvP2fRlTIc jZGXPh/BmwLsX66e2d8xIWAR4veAuo7RztV7XjoM2DT4BQ+39m1mlipJKIUenKEKu4qG QyPLeRK/OU+uegz+2Hsy81gdHMvzxOAX6+HgaSosVyt1rPM4F+pO1fass5ElDJDwxiLY L9ug== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVx+KCmExTcD0jcOJhfIBEyn/4bHLo7PWn54uAulfJZ+VZYHPOsFB8AQQQzb5u587ksYw4++QnRrIFI8Yc= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzKv3V3OlVURym3+hZ2+9kfXgyKHaJ2s5c96Uw9E9s7kzNHg9cc k9+jWRRA0eLvA377imURSXeV85Z8QEWCrrGl5iftQuZCKFcsflu0I6JDjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHXXidObSOGM7+7QgwxHMtPS7XQDGL4FBG/g6ouajW1gblFHPKDI1CGRY7XH91QD8zD8QSAcw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:48a3:b0:424:78c5:c562 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42478c5c698mr37379355e9.0.1718896569981; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (p4fe3a551.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.165.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4247d0ca20esm29184375e9.27.2024.06.20.08.16.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87le2z4rzg.fsf@gmail.com> (Helmut Eller's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:18:59 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::335; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x335.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320325 Archived-At: Helmut Eller writes: > The numbers are the duration for scanning the root, in cycles; multiply > with 400 picoseconds (or whatever you think is appropriate for one > cycle) to get the time. E.g. for lispsym, the maximum was 2853050 * > 400e-12 =3D~ 1.1 millisecond. > > That's down from 10 milliseconds it used to take to scan the dump. Nice =F0=9F=91=8D! > I expected that staticvec to be at the top, but I guess lispsym actually > makes sense. It's strange though, that the maximum and minimum for > lispsym vary so much. I find it quite unexpected that lispsym takes so long, compared to a multi-megabyte dump. Hm. Is it an optimized build? > I general, ert-tests.el is quite strange. To run all tests in there > with: > > make lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-tests > > requires almost 4GB peak, but when running > ert-test-run-tests-batch-expensive alone, it requires much less than > that. > > Here are the patches for this: Pushed.