From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: pgg-gpg broken? Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:22:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0510031250u66ea1349yb437d539ce4027ef@mail.gmail.com> <20051008103627.GA1218@kenny.sha-bang.local> <2cd46e7f0510081131h14e2bbeaga7f1a33ebd6347c8@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0510101415t76825ea7u9749fe23da54ce@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0510121647x3c51fb65pc883ed61f4e864ab@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0510200708x4640d1c2t50743cf439e52dd4@mail.gmail.com> <87pskfq361.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <877j6mg2af.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144264978 7247 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 19:22:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, Simon Josefsson Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 05 21:22:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDah-0001CN-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:22:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDae-0000cE-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDaJ-0000XG-4U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDaH-0000Vv-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDaH-0000Vm-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.141.58.119] (helo=km1136.keymachine.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FRDdq-0008Ef-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.de (xdsln034.osnanet.de [212.95.113.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by km1136.keymachine.de (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k35JMDHZ030051; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:22:13 +0200 Original-Received: from wilde by kenny.sha-bang.de with local (Kenny MUA v.0409034.42) ID 1FRDa3-0003Re-Km; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:22:15 +0200 Original-To: Daiki Ueno , Reiner Steib In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:14:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52450 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62534 Archived-At: Reiner Steib wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05 2006, Sascha Wilde wrote: > >> I just needed to decrypt an old Mail using Gnus/pgg (which i decrypted >> successfully many times before), but it failed. > [...] >> Signing mails works (including querying the passphrase). >> >> Might this be related to the latest changes by Daiki? > > Could you test with `pgg-gpg.el' revision 1.4 from Emacs CVS or > revision 7.11 from Gnus CVS, please? I fetched 1.4 from Emacs CVS and it works perfectly well with the mail in question. Same holds true for 1.8 from Emacs CVS, which includes my original version of gpg-agent support, but it stops working with 1.9 -- so it seems the problem lies withing Daiki's new code... Some more revelations regarding the problem: It is somewhat more specific: while I can't decrypt the old mail with the current pgg-gpg code, I actually can decrypt an fresh test Mail, which I just send to myself for testing. This matches my observations about the different versions. I have no idea whats so special about this one mail (it's encrypted for more than one key, but this is no problem in other cases...). cheers sascha --=20 Sascha Wilde : xedit? Das sieht zwar wie vi aus als k=F6nne es nix, aber im : Gegensatz zu vi kann es wirklich nix und nix ist noch gesch= =F6nt! : (Michael Core in dafc)