From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does not byte-compile return the compiled function in Emacs 24? Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:12:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323249157 19614 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2011 09:12:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 10:12:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYDYG-0004TV-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:12:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38463 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYDYF-00087N-W0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:12:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYDYD-00087F-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:12:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYDY8-0003BQ-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:12:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:39246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYDY7-0003BG-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DFA182446B; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:12:21 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: b1TAMJpWd4xU3UEv3R3G+0XuAK50sHVt3fR5rrX716U= Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-109-220.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.109.220]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 37DA01C000F4; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:12:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 738DDCA29C; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:12:20 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I hope I bought the right relish... zzzzzzzzz... In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 7 Dec 2011 02:54:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146536 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > In mumamo.el I am building functions for fontification. I compile them > like this: > > (setq byte-compiled-fun (let ((major-syntax-table)) > (byte-compile fetch-func-definition))) > > Previously it returned the byte-compiled function, but now it seems to > return t. (Or, at least it did not when I tested.) Works for me. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."