From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:18:46 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8737xrweel.fsf@googlemail.com> <87r3lazla7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bnce1ko7.fsf@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443993550 9315 80.91.229.3 (4 Oct 2015 21:19:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 21:19:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 04 23:19:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiqgX-0000s9-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 23:19:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiqgW-0000kd-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiqgI-0000kN-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiqgE-00052T-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]:33699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiqgE-00052P-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:18:50 -0400 Original-Received: by pacex6 with SMTP id ex6so155833361pac.0 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:18:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=MaqznfbnOy8pE4nGaQxeapJMjQ5mCqEW+q9IFMlmAVk=; b=QhohAdcjeesqPqlJJODz34qtXb/yLb9G3z0UWTUbzHcs3ooSVTCwIsVv1YSno5+vDs susHWDtJbzX+IavRKp648Y7u5rLdrMVAu2g2gXR95s5so0oKGr9mkfPdUKibk0kN/QNH ej5fpdS1E42PbLDa8G26QMoDUWIwfy4xcoloIOn/HikYo+mKKbIzu6jJCAEY3yaSNbPM vZEtZH9hteBUqqrePqBVUQBHoeQHUEGE3efOdFyV3IZOjhoQ/x4BPvMTjmkXEYRIU4le YumA7Yhv9nuYKL1gCf5F0CACZC+ZOaqdqo0DxEsBbEIy7r6CH0btyvSkUb2GbBdOvymF u5oQ== X-Received: by 10.66.220.164 with SMTP id px4mr36247480pac.15.1443993529514; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pq1sm23511275pbb.91.2015.10.04.14.18.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 098E0F070A98; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 14:18:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bnce1ko7.fsf@googlemail.com> (Jens K. Loewe's message of "Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:46:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190907 Archived-At: >>>>> Jens K Loewe writes: > So you say it's wrong to let the user work with the best tool for his job if > it's not free? Hi Jens, I'm not sure emacs-devel is still the place to continue this discussion, especially since we haven't found a new maintainer yet, and that was the objective for this thread. I believe the FSF has other forums where you could raise this concern, if someone from that group could point them out. John