From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:22:15 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <87wpuhh15s.fsf@T420.taylan> <562683B9.1060305@yandex.ru> <87fv15gybo.fsf@T420.taylan> <20151020.214835.278236566.wl@gnu.org> <877fmhgtcx.fsf@T420.taylan> <83pp08e2jx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445453394 15462 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2015 18:49:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 21 20:49:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyRy-0005wo-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:49:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyRx-0007l8-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyRr-0007kG-Aa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyRq-0007AK-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]:36504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoyRm-00078U-FA; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so64732582pac.3; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:49:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=St9Eo9Tf7PXUK0Qb/flbcUWxbvO/hVt70nwQRGwcmSs=; b=OVLuqIspMEFwPKP4uhzCe59RQi8mA4qKehkL4zpNVrXQdq4+NpeVKdo2GG6ISHw6+h AD8qCbJUYUrwET4rMd8Ztg3MX9xB17fzM7aRov6ytpDPav33lKNSCHhY8RUd2BqYKunW RCxMWzugNqRAQagfxA4hkCGTyUe5LuROT/rxNizQi2tY0IA/v2JGLQq5HLHPzAkBDYoo iVk2fgLF17cgC1BfnMuLe6cMrwF0YewwUhxz8MSemHyWCaOBTV0i1kmn7azCN1Jfwd1o J3qs2ObqpvIxqU1kibJISOUv9vnvpSKcl9C7oK+ctbT3BQBf589P0UqX7Hvz5L0yjeFL 0pkw== X-Received: by 10.66.155.231 with SMTP id vz7mr12059590pab.58.1445453353903; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id st5sm10432610pab.42.2015.10.21.11.49.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CB39CF5B38CF; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:49:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83pp08e2jx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:09:22 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1=2FKammer=22?=), emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192312 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > If there are indeed such people, I encourage them to come here and speak up > for themselves. Given the history of this thread, I'm not at all sure we > should hear their concerns through intermediaries. Changes in leadership are > a good time to try to make our procedures and conduct better, so now is a > good time for them to speak up. I could agree more, Eli. Now is the best time for those who have been disaffected in the past to come forward, as this is a perfect time to re-examine old wounds and make changes for the better. John