From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:17 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447106806 32698 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 22:06:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aaronecay@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 23:06:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuaG-00063H-S6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 23:06:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuaG-0000wW-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:06:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvua2-0000wP-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvua1-00041Q-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]:36325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvuZx-00040E-7q; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:06:21 -0500 Original-Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so187559058pac.3; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=SoYjsiqUDW5LdZ3aa70o5uv6litPro8LArO9ufnGZv0=; b=vZ7/Cp6axxS/G3ggcuwTrM8GX/XuU5JS3vEwiWslAOAx9MqXtSBkzKAlVCDeKhDAIf xG7O0Hdq/JnQ/POG4tURSf0wTfMmfM4yw2CZYAh0AVrpRalgHjHBNs/xf7ske61ol0dh c/tuH7S0naypF/AFCS8zmlR9x+vp8lDHc/r1TZa5rCu61IqKKcdbwL/8ujwrLRGMaDuj guiX/gdNqTo7qh+MoZr5qYiKghTBgwNY5QSNbbLSQTy/arDu6xXvbNpu22M40Z8xj57e rqRjzc2ri5yTmvfLRJkZ8qEv/p2X9YMuy8Kt/MFv0X3n1ndFnYexzm+LWNJwJI8gz4bI J/2w== X-Received: by 10.66.162.100 with SMTP id xz4mr232542pab.145.1447106780612; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.attlocal.net (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ns1sm79704pbc.67.2015.11.09.14.06.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.attlocal.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4352D104EC334; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:06:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:51:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Richard Stallman , eliz@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, aaronecay@gmail.com, Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193772 Archived-At: >>>>> Richard Stallman writes: > This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and > seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in > the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says > Maintainer: emacs-devel. If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer. John