From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:05:07 -0800 Message-ID: References: <878u6ax7c7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2ptq5t3.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kxx60e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877flswse5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737wgw7kf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87io5bv1it.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87egfzuwca.fsf@lifelogs.com> <876118u6f2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8737w3qero.fsf@lifelogs.com> <831tbn9g9j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447884573 383 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 22:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 23:09:29 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzAut-0005uI-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 23:09:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzAus-0001N9-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzAuR-0000sH-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzAuQ-0003EW-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]:33779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzAuN-000399-NO; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:08:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so59575632pab.0; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:08:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=OT00+WakjEG1Ac8Ez0cJFt8/i70EZSFKC12v4T/yeRU=; b=M5nJk3ThjgsduEBBqdyUzMB38BAwVD+JXRRwN7tQgYtFa6CL2X743Q/a9N8J27dAQa mix9qsw6uhGO61Qjhii1lbnTyW0y1ptiENMfOa3BwssAunjUWhSDmjenJ+rIAqn0ivDb uRDN4wHbBfjbRqLBdg7N139K3wJYa7OwayER/XeB1Mbt9tG5qZC4VSKvvy+Y9SF2do9g ZH5h1iUEvrxCgEP5eGTHaE7JIUQsZcxZ2E8drkVqYDcis7mN5bplHD2SQZm+jQjsp8Gd 89bVD/I4eBJUw1J2gPaBnYTWwtnus6ugJMI+s55xbkk1HsbK5lKRFQdo5R8Vt1QmPJwB rOTQ== X-Received: by 10.68.137.73 with SMTP id qg9mr5372119pbb.125.1447884535066; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:08:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id tn2sm6132078pbc.9.2015.11.18.14.08.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:08:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 85DA0109DD867; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:08:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <831tbn9g9j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:58:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194759 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> * what planned features remain unfinished? >> * are there any known bugs? > Not for me to answer, but in any case new features should go to master, I > think. Therefore, I suggest to wait with them until what we have on the > release branch stabilizes. (E.g., I just had to make some fixes there in the > Windows-specific code, and also the code is formatted not according to our > conventions.) >> * when do we make `--with-modules' the default? > Not in Emacs 25.1, I think. +1 on both points. John