From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer'
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:01:57 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2637pbwom.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87skb0iw04.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:03:55 +0100")
>>>> Irrelevant: neither example uses (save-excursion (set-buffer ..) ...).
>>> Don't be disingenuous. with-temp-buffer uses with-current-buffer, which
>>> is basically (save-current-buffer (set-buffer ...
>> save-current-buffer != save-excursion
>> This warning is specifically aimed at reminding people that the two are
>> different, so you clearly need to see this warning a few more times
>> before you start to understand what it's about.
> And you clearly need to reread my post to understand what it's about.
> If you macroexpand with-temp-buffer and save-current-buffer, my argument
save-current-buffer is not a macro.
> still holds: the warning is wrong, and the macro-expanded code
> explicitly uses all those commands which you claim are equivalent in
> this situation, with different results.
Which commands do I claim are equivalent in which circumstance?
Are you saying that (one of) your code(s) using with-temp-buffer causes
the warning to be output? That would be a bug, indeed.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-29 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 19:19 `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' Roland Winkler
2009-12-21 15:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-21 16:23 ` David Kastrup
2009-12-22 12:51 ` martin rudalics
2009-12-23 0:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-23 9:07 ` David Kastrup
2009-12-24 4:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-12-24 9:03 ` David Kastrup
2009-12-29 16:01 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2010-01-04 9:09 ` Drew Adams
2010-01-04 18:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-05 20:17 ` David Kastrup
2010-01-06 0:02 ` Drew Adams
2010-01-06 4:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-06 8:07 ` David Kastrup
2010-01-06 8:57 ` Drew Adams
2010-01-10 4:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-10 8:12 ` David Kastrup
2010-01-10 21:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-11 8:24 ` David Kastrup
2010-01-11 9:21 ` martin rudalics
2010-01-11 16:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-10 17:03 ` Drew Adams
2010-01-10 4:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-10 15:58 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2010-01-10 18:05 ` martin rudalics
2010-01-10 18:06 ` Drew Adams
2010-01-10 19:44 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2009-12-24 14:04 ` Roland Winkler
2010-01-04 17:08 ` Davis Herring
2010-01-04 17:34 ` David Kastrup
2010-01-04 18:33 ` Stefan Monnier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-18 9:20 Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-18 15:29 ` Juanma Barranquero
2009-12-18 15:58 ` Thierry Volpiatto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2637pbwom.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).