From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr workflow Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:05:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4B4B93AB.3030903@gnu.org> <1f77704b1001111357l29886b88oaf1da0ddbb12db62@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263251179 30293 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2010 23:06:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 00:06:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUTKr-0000NT-Ce for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:06:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51602 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUTKs-0004Zu-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUTKm-0004Zp-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUTKh-0004Yt-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36625 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUTKh-0004Yk-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:39674) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUTKc-0003CU-F5; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE91C0034A; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:05:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from igel.home (DSL01.83.171.152.131.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [83.171.152.131]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB75F90064; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:05:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6FE28CA298; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:05:51 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: All of life is a blur of Republicans and meat! In-Reply-To: <1f77704b1001111357l29886b88oaf1da0ddbb12db62@mail.gmail.com> (Sam Steingold's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:57:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119838 Archived-At: Sam Steingold writes: > On 1/11/10, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Sam Steingold writes: >> >> > 1. Am I the only one who thinks this is a little too convoluted? (the only >> > other DVC I regularly use is hg, and there the workflow is "commit+push" >> > instead of the recommended emacs workflow "commit+merge+commit"). >> >> >> Nothing stops you from using the more advanced workflow. > > what "more advanced workflow"? The one you are used to. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."